Search for: "CO.1. Means"
Results 4841 - 4860
of 16,757
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2023, 2:00 am
This post was co-authored by David Derfel and summer law student Rachel Weitz. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 2:38 pm
Remember that the COBRA subsidy is currently set to end as of December 31, 2009, meaning that for qualifying events occurring after 1/1/2010, COBRA notice and election forms will NOT contain information about eligibility for the subsidy. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 5:50 am
” In 2008, the United States Supreme Court decided Allison Engine Co., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 2:05 pm
On March 10, 2011, the Federal Circuit is scheduled to hear oral arguments in Tianrui Group Co. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:32 am
[1] They’re photogenic, so people like them. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Thus, using enforcement actions as a method to set regulatory policy means that the public is denied a chance to provide input. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:32 pm
July 1, 2020 Marston, J.) [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 7:38 am
Canal Co. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
Among other arguments, Hamilton offers the following:To what purpose then require the co-operation of the Senate? [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
(SPF 15 means that only 1/15thof the burning radiation will reach the skin, SPF 30 means only 1/30th will, SPF 50 means only 1/50th will, etc.) [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 4:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 5:03 am
Kulmatycki, supra(quoting Sherman & Co v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 1:50 pm
This also means that we have to keep assessing whether our quality measures remain up to date. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:27 am
The Court also noted that – as it transpires from the case file and the hearing – the close cooperation between the companies manifested itself in the operation of their websites, the domains of which belonged to only one of the co-defendants, through which the products at issue in the main proceedings were marketed by means of cross-references between these sites (para. 39). [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm
Co. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 8:34 am
Co., Inc., 2004 WY 97, ¶ 9, 96 P.3d 484, 490 (Wyo. 2004). [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 8:34 am
Co., Inc., 2004 WY 97, ¶ 9, 96 P.3d 484, 490 (Wyo. 2004). [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 1, Mr. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:03 am
Why would the CO do this? [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:38 am
The district court did a bunch of odd things, including holding that “origin” in §43(a)(1)(A) didn’t mean the same thing as “origin” in §43(a)(1)(B), so that while “origin” for the former means place of manufacture, it could mean recipe or heritage in the latter. [read post]
