Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 4841 - 4860
of 33,825
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2021, 1:31 pm
Now, employers have an appellate decision they can cite to – Wesson v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:08 am
” Whalen v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:03 pm
” (California Building Industry Assn. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 12:36 pm
Dukes v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 7:28 am
Under California foreclosure law, a trustee's sale eliminates all interests in the property that are recorded after the deed of trust was recorded. [read post]
16 May 2013, 8:25 am
Under California law, a case must present an actual controversy between parties before the court will consider it. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 10:45 am
In a decision being closely watched by many, the California Supreme Court holds today in Olson v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:00 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 12:10 pm
(Andersen, et al. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 1:53 pm
A recent, unpublished legal decision (Rapid Settlements v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:05 am
California law has specific requirements regarding the payment of final wages to terminated employees. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 8:35 am
Overtime In Gentry v. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 10:20 am
BPI * Another Murky Opinion on Lawyers Buying Keyword Ads on Other Lawyers’ Names–In re Naert * Keyword Ad Lawsuit Isn’t Covered By California’s Anti-SLAPP Law * Confusion From Competitive Keyword Advertising? [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 7:57 pm
Trial Court did not Err in Holding that Class Counsel owed Duty to Absent Class Members to Represent them in Collection of Judgment, not merely through Obtaining Judgment, Particularly in Light of Defendant-Employer’s Lack of Assets and Possible Bankruptcy Filing California Appellate Court Holds Plaintiffs filed a putative class action in California state court against their employer, West Coast Digital GSM, alleging labor law violations; specifically, the class… [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 5:13 am
Illinois Brick could have been overruled in Apple v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 3:11 am
No doubt this wasn’t what the California legislature had in mind in 1937 (or maybe they did given what was happening in 1937), but the law is on the books and says what it says. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 6:04 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 4:22 pm
In Lawson v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 6:00 am
In Hunt v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 8:48 am
The regs bring California into explicit alignment with federal law on this point. [read post]
