Search for: "Defendants A-F"
Results 4841 - 4860
of 29,830
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2009, 12:56 am
Belt, __ F.3d __ (8th Cir. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 1:01 am
Davisco Foods Intern., Inc., _ F.3d _ (9th Cir. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 7:06 pm
Colkley, 899 F.2d 297, 300 (4th. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 1:57 pm
Defendants filed a summary judgment motion of inequitable conduct, which the district court denied. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
., ___ F.3d ___ (7th Cir. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 4:13 am
Section 506(b) governs the allowability of attorney fees as a component of a bankruptcy claim It shouldn't have any effect on whether these fees can be recovered against an individual debtor, as opposed to the bankruptcy estate.In re Baroff, 105 F.3d 439 (9th Cir. 1997) applied the Fobian rule in a dischargeability case, leading to a strange result in which the Debtor was awarded fees for successfully defending a fraud claim under §523(a)(2)(a) (fraud in the… [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 5:19 am
Some defendants are immune from suit. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 7:33 am
United States v, Driggers,__ F.3d __, No. 07-31090, 2009 WL 692003 (9th Cir. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 8:31 pm
P. 5.1(a)(2) provides that a defendant=s right to a preliminary hearing does not apply in a case where the defendant is charged by indictment. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 12:47 pm
Bose Corp., 538 F. [read post]
12 May 2008, 8:49 am
Telfaire, 469 F.2d 552 (D.C. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 12:28 pm
The defendants are fugitives and remain at large. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 3:45 pm
Defendants, David Miller and Donald Miller, were qualified medical marijuana patients along with defendant, Katherine Null, who served as David’s registered medical marijuana primary caregiver. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 8:08 am
The trial court denied the defendant's motion for new trial, and the Appellate court remanded for an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:54 am
See Recio, 371 F.3d at 1100. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 7:00 am
U.S. v Jimenez, 513 F.3d 62 (3d Cir. 2008). 2. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 7:53 am
Flynn and Richard F. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 8:45 am
After Defendant's Motion for Summary Disposition was denied, Defendants appealed the case to the Michigan Court of Appeals, which held that Plaintiff's contract claim warranted dismissal because Plaintiff had failed to provide copies of the pertinent contracts pursuant to MCR 2.113(F). [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 6:43 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 575 F.3d 1312, 1326 (Fed. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 7:16 am
Williams, 604 F.2d 1102, 1123 (8th Cir. 1979). [read post]
