Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 4841 - 4860
of 8,956
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2019, 10:59 am
Lunney's data does not take that into consideration. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 5:32 am
It began by noting that under the plain error rule, the party asserting error “`must establish (1) that there was in fact an error; (2) that the error was plain; and (3) that the error’” affected the defendant’s substantial rights. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 10:16 am
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(a)(1)(E). [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 8:56 am
Id. at *1. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 3:41 am
"Nationwide, there does not seem to be a clear trend. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
The first, the Sixth Circuit’s “authority or duty” test, required plaintiffs to prove “state action” by establishing that either (1) the “text of state law requires an officeholder to maintain a social-media account,” (2) the defendant official “use[s] … state resources” or “government staff” to run the account, or (3) the “accoun[t] belong[s] to an office, rather than an individual officeholder. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 6:32 am
Defendants next argued that Mr. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:07 am
§ 316.1932(1)(c), Fla. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 6:50 am
” (Order, 2:17-20.) [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 8:32 am
The ADA requires that at least 5% of available seating be accessible, or at least 1 if less than 20 seats are provided. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
” (Order, 2:17-20.) [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:21 am
Yesterday’s deadly train derailment in the Bronx occurred about 7:20 am. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 3:06 am
It also leaves open the possibility that 10b5-1 transactions could be exempt from insider trading prosecution. [read post]
22 May 2015, 5:29 am
Nor does the committee believe that a judge’s impartiality may reasonably be questioned (see 22 NYCRR 100.3[E][1]) or that there is an appearance of impropriety (see 22 NYCRR 100.2[A]) based solely on having previously ‘friended’ certain individuals who are now involved in some manner in a pending action. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 10:53 am
The court shall award the plaintiff the costs of bringing the action if the plaintiff prevails and the court finds that the defendant, at the time the defendant caused the recorded document to be recorded or filed, knew or should have known that the recorded document is fraudulent. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 5:54 am
It does not change the award amounts and attorney’s fees permitted for cases that do not involve a good-faith belief by the employer. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 7:17 am
Hayman that the defense does have the proffered document. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 12:29 pm
FARMINGTON -- A judge declared a mistrial after a witness said she saw a photograph of the defendant a month ago -- 3 1/2 years after she was robbed. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 1:47 pm
” The complaint alleges that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 8:00 pm
We have been at this charade for better than 20 years. [read post]
