Search for: "Doe Parties 1-100" Results 4841 - 4860 of 5,021
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2008, 12:00 pm
Ticket prices: Supporter $25 Activist $50, Champion $100, Hero $100. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 1:23 am
As a solo practitioner he is able to devote 100% of his time to each individual client. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:47 pm
Hillary Clinton does not appear to be scaling back her campaign. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 6:25 am
  [31]  The FECA addressed many of the weaknesses of the Federal Corrupt Practices Act by limiting the amount that candidates could personally donate to their campaigns and requiring disclosure of the source of most donations over $100. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 8:13 am
My client came to me with proposed closing documents that included:1. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 2:44 pm
Form 2(a), so too does a removing party's notice of removal sufficiently establish jurisdictional grounds for removal by making jurisdictional allegations in the same manner.The Court added that, "[o]f course, on a challenge of jurisdictional allegations, '[t]he party seeking removal bears the burden of demonstrating that removal jurisdiction is proper.' Blackwater, 460 F.3d at 583. [read post]
8 Mar 2008, 11:41 am
This seemingly creates a conflict with current federal acquisition policy, which encourages parties to resolve controversies over procurement at the agency level whenever possible. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 2:04 pm
In the three period case it is 1/3 of the enforcement cost. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 4:00 pm
In the case of Washington DC, for which there was no exit polling data, I assumed that 100% of the voters would have answered "Democratic" to a "party identification" question, even though the highest percentage (from closed primaries -- like DC's -- in NY and NM) in that categories was 87%. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 1:55 pm
  (California's 1-500 does not contain the settlement language in the text of the rule, but its purpose is the same.) [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 2:57 am
Consideration #1:  Is the EDRM XML standard coordinated with other industry standards bodies in the technology arena? [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 4:03 am
Since Part 137 is applicable to cases "where representation has commenced on or after January 1, 2002" (22 NYCRR 137.1(a)), it does not apply to the parties' fee arbitration, as it is undisputed that defendants commenced their representation of [*4]Pickard prior to that effective date. [read post]