Search for: "Fields v. A S"
Results 4841 - 4860
of 17,270
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2018, 10:20 am
In Washington v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:27 am
Fomine v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:44 pm
In terms of defining what is meant by a parody, we have the Court of Justice of the European Union’s definition in the case of Deckmyn v Vandersteen (C-201/13). [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:16 am
In Brogan v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 8:00 am
Marr v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 5:22 am
Recently, I fielded a media call on the Murphy case. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:47 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:05 am
v=qlRtLGorhdY Pricing: Per month per user fees. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 7:44 am
HP Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 2:00 am
Igihozo v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 4:31 pm
It is generally accepted that the more a decision lies in the “macro-political” field the less intrusive will be the court’s supervision (R v Secretary of State for Education, ex p. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 7:41 am
In Texas v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 10:45 am
People v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 9:04 am
Resisting this conclusion, the VCDL argues that the footage implies that it "failed to deliver on its mission, thereby casting aspersion on the VCDL's prestige and standing in the field of Second Amendment advocacy. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:25 am
Wang Jiangqiao, a judge at the Hangzhou Internet Court said that the court “behave[s] as an ‘incubator’ for Internet space governance, a ‘test field’ for Internet judicial rules, a ‘leader’ for diversified Internet disputes, and a ‘first mover’ for the transformation of Internet trials” with China having “set up three Internet courts in Hangzhou, Beijing and Guangzhou. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 3:05 am
What the CJEU did say was that:Individual words are not protected, because they are not (literary) works;A part of a work is entitled to the same protection as the whole, insofar as that part is sufficiently original in the sense that it is its author's own intellectual creation.According to the AG, this finding is "obvious":the author of a literary work cannot appropriate common words or expressions, in the same way that a composer cannot claim an exclusive right over the… [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 8:57 am
The 4th Circuit majority shoehorned the three-pronged test from Lemon v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 8:56 am
Facts: This case (Ferraro v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 8:41 am
Facts: This case (Doe v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 7:19 am
The court rejected this contention, looking to the Supreme Court’s 2011 opinion in Thompson v. [read post]
