Search for: "Good v. State of California"
Results 4841 - 4860
of 7,503
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2011, 3:46 am
California, supra, at 172, and Palko v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:42 am
Haldex Brake Products Corporation (Docket Report) District Court S D California: Certificates of correction can overreach: Multimedia Patent Trust v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 1:54 pm
Seifu 21-742Issue: Whether the Federal Arbitration Act requires the enforcement of a bilateral arbitration agreement providing that a worker cannot raise representative claims under California’s Private Attorneys General Act, thereby preempting the contrary holding in Iskanian v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:54 pm
United States, 21-8190 Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 2:41 am
Resources Data Harvesting and Profiling: Ricci v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
United States, 12-223, and Pleau v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:17 am
The question whether the Holder Rule’s limit on a consumer’s recovery to the “amounts paid by the debtor” under the contract includes the consumer’s attorney’s fees is currently before the California Supreme Court in Pulliam v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:03 pm
The majority’s rule in Seila Law v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:25 pm
(Respondent briefs are due in mid-Sept and the State of California just filed its brief with the Court today). [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:44 am
Orange County Fire Authority and Seibert v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 7:25 am
Jan. 2, 2018) is a long opinion that contains a good discussion of the application of the 11th Amendment to ADA claims against state agencies and an equally useful discussion of why sidewalks are covered by the ADA as both “facilities” and “services. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm
” As noted above, the Seventh Circuit in Judge v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am
California, 10-10923, is likely being held for Williams v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:33 pm
The practical effect of the decision was substantially because many US States, particularly California and New York, still apply, at least arguably, a per se standard to resale price maintenance agreements. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:13 am
Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:39 pm
In Paratransit, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 8:23 am
Like some, but not all, federal courts in California this one was willing to dismiss state law claims as predominating over federal claims but not an ADA claim that was adequately pleaded. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 1:24 am
First, FTC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:51 am
The second correct answer is obviously “Being an employer in the State of California. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 11:58 am
United States v. [read post]
