Search for: "H. C" Results 4841 - 4860 of 12,403
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2015, 1:24 pm by Graham Smith
Regrettably there is no substitute for quoting the section:"to identify—(a) which person or apparatus is using an internet service where—(i) the service and time of use are already known, but(ii) the identity of the person or apparatus using the service is not known,(b) which internet communications service is being used, and when andhow it is being used, by a person or apparatus whose identity is already known, or(c) where or when a person or apparatus whose identity is… [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 10:47 am by Sarah Andropoulos
Other states such as Texas (Rule 7.04(g)) and Georgia (Rule 7.2(c)(3)) have similar rules related to actors portraying attorneys in legal advertising. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 10:47 am by Sarah Andropoulos
On the topic of fees, therefore, in several states such as Texas (Rule 7.04(h)) and Pennsylvania (Rule 7.2(h)(1)), when lawyers advertise contingent fee arrangements, for example, they must include a disclaimer stating that clients may still be responsible for other costs of filing a lawsuit, such as filing fees, administrative fees, and so on, if they apply. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 5:01 pm
(c) CMS clarified that the regulations in 42 CFR 411.357(t) regarding retention payments in underserved areas is correct. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 9:33 am
 Never Too Late 67  [week ending on Sunday 11 October] – Eponia rumours | Batmobile and copyright | EPO and human rights | Gucci v Guess | NOCN (Formerly National Open College Network) v Open College Network Credit4Learning | New CJEU reference on linking and copyright | Viennese waltz may be the last dance for Board members | Richard Perry v F H Brundle & Others | Safe harbour and the Schrems case | Economics of Domain names… [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 7:16 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
En la práctica, el contrato es un híbrido entre los estatutos (“By-Laws”) que deben adoptar las corporaciones y los acuerdos de accionistas que pueden adoptar los accionistas de una corporación, y es el documento en el cual se estipulan todos los términos y condiciones que rigen la LLC de manera clara y detallada. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 5:27 am
In the North American colonies in the 17–18th c., and subsequently in the United States, servant was the usual designation for a slave.... 1852 H. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 4:29 pm
”In contrast section 8 of the Representation Agreement Act provides:Test of incapability for standard provisions8  (1) An adult may make a representation agreement consisting of one or more of the standard provisions authorized by section 7 even though the adult is incapable of(a) making a contract,(b) managing his or her health care, personal care or legal matters, or(c) the routine management of his or her financial affairs.(2) In deciding whether an adult is… [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 6:56 am by Latham & Watkins LLP
The guidance follows the decision of the European Court of Justice (the ECJ) in Case C-362/14 – Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner that Decision 2000/520 of the European Commission, which stated that Safe Harbor-certified US companies provide adequate protection for personal data transferred to them from the EU (the Safe Harbor Adequacy Decision), is invalid. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Pp. 401. $85.00 cloth (ISBN: 1107038723).Deborah DinnerRenee C. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 2:00 pm by Jared Bomberg and Paul Otto
However, according to Section 106(c) these liability protections do not extend to an organization that has engaged in gross negligence or willful misconduct in the course of conducting these activities. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 7:14 am by Jonathan H. Adler
[C]onservative arguments are present at Williams, in both curricular and extra-curricular ways, and, more powerfully within the political discourse and actions that surround and permeate the campus. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 7:30 am by Law Offices of Nancy J. Bickford, APC
” Family Code section 1101(h) reads as follows: “(h) Remedies for the breach of the fiduciary duty by one spouse, as set forth in Sections 721 and 1100, when the breach falls within the ambit of Section 3294 of the Civil Code shall include, but not be limited to, an award to the other spouse of 100 percent, or an amount equal to 100 percent, of any asset undisclosed or transferred in breach of the fiduciary duty. [read post]