Search for: "House v. Close"
Results 4841 - 4860
of 7,547
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2013, 6:33 pm
Although the decisions may be very close, several commentators have predicted the Supreme Court will find both Proposition 8 and DOMA unconstitutional. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 12:27 pm
Katz closed the door to the phone booth to establish his reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am
Under French law that requires the permission of the couture houses. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 8:12 am
Yesterday's case is Florida v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 5:09 am
However, the appeals court said that McCleese can seek that the charges against him be dismissed based on the decision in People v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 4:34 am
On November 5, I posted here about Florida v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 4:34 am
On November 5, I posted here about Florida v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 2:48 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Walls v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 2:44 am
The continuing resolution passed both houses with this provision in it; the President could in theory refuse to sign it. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 7:26 am
Public housing agencies have rules and regulations regarding prior convictions: in Lowell Housing Authority v.Melendez, the Supreme Judicial Court ruled that a violent offense which occurred within one mile from the defendant’s home in a public housing complex was close enough to endanger the other tenants of the housing complex to permit the termination of his lease. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 2:41 am
In related news, on Tuesday 26 March 2013, the House of Lords will consider amendments to the Justice and Security Bill, concerning closed material proceedings, made by the House of Commons. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 11:41 am
London Borough of Brent v Tudor [2013] EWCA Civ 157This was an appeal of a Circuit Judge’s finding that LB Brent’s possession claim under Ground 16, Schedule 2 Housing Act 1985 failed because the property was reasonably needed to accommodate those living there. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 11:41 am
London Borough of Brent v Tudor [2013] EWCA Civ 157This was an appeal of a Circuit Judge’s finding that LB Brent’s possession claim under Ground 16, Schedule 2 Housing Act 1985 failed because the property was reasonably needed to accommodate those living there. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 11:55 am
Barasch v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 3:18 pm
In People v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
In the March 20, 2013 opinion in SCDSS v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 4:36 am
Jones, of US v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:19 am
We will follow the case closely. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:58 am
In fact, the first Supreme Court Justice, James Wilson, wrote in Chisholm v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 11:49 am
Mrs Beech’s parents had been joint tenants of a 3 bedroom property at 31 Tilshead Close, Birmingham since 1967. [read post]
