Search for: "House v. House"
Results 4841 - 4860
of 41,225
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2019, 8:14 am
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 9:14 am
Coolit v Vidal. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 2:46 am
Defendant was ordered outside of a house to talk to the police, and that was a seizure under the totality of the circumstances. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 1:37 pm
Pye v Stodday Land Ltd [2016] EWHC 2454 (Ch)); and with the need for the parties to know where they stand and, in particular, whether a notice is effective. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm
On the recovery of success fees, Mitting J accepted that there was a stark conflict between the ratio of House of Lords’ judgment in Campbell v MGN Ltd (No 2) [2005] UKHL 61 and MGN v UK, the ruling of the Strasbourg Court in the same case. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 11:52 am
[7] U.S. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 6:11 am
Echostar, Princo v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 11:03 am
This argument would seem to be clear from the judgments of the Court of Appeal and the House of Lords in White and White v Riverside Housing Association Ltd [2005] EWCA Civ 1385; [2006] HLR 15 and [2007] UKHL 20; [2007] HLR 31. [read post]
31 May 2013, 6:59 am
The conflicting positions of the two houses were reconciled by House Speaker Henry Clay in what came to be known as the Missouri Compromise. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 7:30 am
Photo from Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0).On Monday, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit issued a ruling in California Restaurant Association v. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 9:22 am
This affected the family’s housing needs. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 9:43 am
Michelle V. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 2:04 am
(note: see now the Social Security (Notification of Changes in Circumstances) Regulations SI 2001/3252, Reg 4(1C), added by Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2010/2449, reg 7(3)). [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 2:04 am
(note: see now the Social Security (Notification of Changes in Circumstances) Regulations SI 2001/3252, Reg 4(1C), added by Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2010/2449, reg 7(3)). [read post]
4 Sep 2016, 5:30 am
Pignatelli v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 6:28 pm
We also explain how to get deal with the badly flawed 1926 ruling in Village of Euclid v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 1:31 pm
Port of London Authority v Paul Mendoza [2017] UKUT 146 (TCC). [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 1:21 pm
Samuels v Birmingham City Council (2019) UKSC 28 The Supreme Court, finally, has delivered its judgment on the issue of the assessment of ‘reasonable expenses’ when considering the affordability of rent in homelessness decisions. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 12:42 pm
by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
