Search for: "IN RE B E S" Results 4841 - 4860 of 7,829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2012, 11:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Our latest data confirm that we're taking steps in the right direction to curb absenteeism, and these new initiatives will keep us on track. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:13 am by Debra A. McCurdy
On May 10, 2012, CMS released two final rules designed to reduce regulatory burdens on health care providers as part of the Administration’s ongoing regulatory review initiative. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:03 am by Philip Favro
Even that date seems too sanguine, particularly given Judge Peck’s recent observation about the slow pace of production: “You’re now woefully behind schedule already at the first wave. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by Broc Romanek
If you're not yet a subscriber, try a no-risk trial now to get the issue rushed to you. [read post]
11 May 2012, 11:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Opponent of proposed Classes 7 D, E, and G; 8; and 10 A & B, demonstrating capture by smartphone. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:52 am by Susan Brenner
In New York, the Appellate Division held that, `[b]ank records . . . belong to the bank. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:10 pm by gavin.n.johnson
If you’re running a business and you deal with any health information, you are likely aware of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act’s (HIPAA) Privacy Rule. [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:05 pm
Acrescenta que o paciente é primário, portador de bons antecedentes e sua pena é superior a quatro e inferior a oito anos, o que, nos termos do artigo 33, parágrafo 2º, alínea “b”, do Código Penal, permite o cumprimento da pena em regime semiaberto. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:05 am
A universidade apresentou contrarrazões nas quais pugnou pelo não conhecimento do RE e, caso conhecido, pelo seu não provimento. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
  Schumer called on NPS Director Jonathan B. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:53 pm by Christopher Spizzirri
String Theory Section 5.b. does a lot of good things, but I believe it could use some clarification. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:20 pm by Matthew Bush
BehrendDocket: 11-864Issue(s): Whether a district court may certify a class action without resolving “merits arguments” that bear on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23’s prerequisites for certification, including whether purportedly common issues predominate over individual ones under Rule 23(b)(3).Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (3d Cir.) [read post]