Search for: "J. Eddings"
Results 4841 - 4860
of 6,776
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2011, 5:52 am
Buckelew, GMG3 Ronald J. [read post]
28 May 2011, 9:35 pm
--Duc de Saint-Simon, "Portrait of the Marquis de Villars, Memoires 15 (GF Flammarion 2001) (Delphine de Garidel, ed.) [read post]
28 May 2011, 10:04 am
On 10 November 2010, the day of Sales J’s adverse judgment, DCLG wrote to all the LPAs telling them of a proposed clause in a soon-to-be-drafted Localism Bill abolishing regional strategies; it continued to refer back to the May letter and its reference to this intention being a material planning consideration. [read post]
27 May 2011, 10:40 am
KF224.E9 S7 1969 See Catalog Conciliation -- Canada MEDIATING COMMERCIAL DISPUTES ALLAN J. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:15 am
The judicial review was first heard by Foskett J who, after six days of oral argument and later written submissions,dismissed all of Ms Shoesmith’s applications though he did so with a “lurking sense of unease. [read post]
26 May 2011, 9:55 am
, Charles J. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:02 am
Dowd from West here Find Ray Dowd at Dunnington Bartholow & Miller LLP tweetmeme_source = 'raydowd'; Copyright Litigation Handbook (West 5th Ed. 2010) by Raymond J. [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:46 pm
Id. at 1312-25 (Linn, J., dissenting). [read post]
25 May 2011, 3:01 pm
This does not allow to derive the requirement construed by the ED. [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:20 am
Graham, a policy expert at the Pacific Research Institute, another conservative think tank, asserted in a Journal op-ed piece in April that the state saved nearly $1.3 billion through the first 18 months of the five-year agreement. [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:41 pm
Zurn (University of Massachusetts at Boston - Department of Philosophy) has posted A Question of Institutionalization: Habermas on the Justification of Court-Based Constitutional Review (Jürgen Habermas, DISCOURSE THEORY OF LAW AND DEMOCRACY: FROM THE NATION-STATE TO EUROPE AND THE POSTNATIONAL CONSTELLATION, Vol. 1, Camil Ungureanu, Klaus Guenther, Christian Joerges, eds., Ashgate Publishing, 2011, DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY AND THE INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF JUDICIAL REVIEW,… [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:58 am
Although the 2007 crack amendment helped to soften the disproportionality, the Commission observed even at the time that it “view[ed] the amendment only as a partial remedy to some of the problems associated with” the relative treatment of crack and powder.[5] Consistent with this position, the Commission’s 2010 survey of federal judges found that the overwhelming majority of respondents (70 percent) still felt that the guidelines ranges for crack offenses… [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:11 am
Super. 234, 246-47 (J. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:08 pm
NORMAN J. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:08 pm
” NORMAN J. [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:39 am
Here is the abstract: This chapter provides an introductory overview of Jürgen Habermas’s discourse theory of law. [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:03 am
Finally the matter came to a hearing in February 2011 and Hearing Officer Ed Knock gave his decision on 9 May 2011: Amazon.com, Inc [2011] APO 28. [read post]
20 May 2011, 5:20 pm
As the majority opinion by Judge Carnes puts it, Pumping all the pedals on the prose organ, they charge that by disagreeing with them on this legal issue, we have not only "neglect[ed] our responsibility," "shirked our duty," and "diminish[ed] the institution of the federal courts," Dissenting Op. of Martin, J., at 94-95, but have also "adopt[ed] a posture of judicial impotency that is shocking" and that… [read post]
19 May 2011, 7:22 am
Ed. [read post]
19 May 2011, 6:17 am
J. [read post]
