Search for: "JACKSON v. US " Results 4841 - 4860 of 5,430
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
15 May 2009, 1:40 am
Jackson TownshipGOVERNMENT - Tree-Removal Ordinances"The tree-removal ordinance at issue here is a valid exercise of police power as its provisions are rationally related to its broad environmental goals. [read post]
6 May 2009, 11:24 am
For example, Jackson, dissenting in Korematsu v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 8:39 am
Second, this situation looks a lot like Center for Democracy & Technology v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 3:23 am
  Third, he could get his wish:   the case involving Janet Jackson’s breast exposure at the Super Bowl, FCC v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:48 am
Supreme CourtØ Public Citizen's most recent Sup Ct Watch list hereØ SCOTUSblog's most recent Petitions to Watch hereØ Ross Runkel's US Sup Ct Employment Law Cases - Pending & decided herePetition for Cert Granted:DecidedCrawford v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 9:00 am
. - Justice Robert Jackson, dissenting in Korematsu v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:45 am
The Court had asked for briefing on whether Jackson should be overturned in the context of Montejo v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 8:16 am
Supreme Court which decided the historic case about global warming (Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Supreme CourtØ Ø Public Citizen's most recent Sup Ct Watch list hereØ Ø SCOTUSblog's most recent Petitions to Watch hereØ Ø Ross Runkel's US Sup Ct Employment Law Cases - Pending & decided herePetition for Cert Granted:DecidedCrawford v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 8:15 pm
The Justice Department is asking the Supreme Court to overrule Michigan v. [read post]