Search for: "Light v. State Bar" Results 4841 - 4860 of 5,598
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm by Erin Miller
Opinion below (7th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioners’ reply Amicus brief of DRI – the Voice of the Defense Bar Title: CSX Transportation, Inc. v. [read post]
Dec. 18, 2009)(per curiam) (Whistleblower case remanded in light of decision, holding in State vs. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 12:14 pm by Mark Bennett
(Kelly, I’m still hoping you’ll see the light and bring your talents over to the humans’ side of the bar, whether for injured plaintiffs or for accused defendants.) [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 12:10 pm by Jimmy Verner
State Bar of Texas Section Report - Family Law - Spring 2009 by Jimmy L. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 8:44 am by Tarunabh Khaitan
The Delhi High Court delivered a landmark judgment in the case of Manushi Sangathan v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
Marathon Oil (Patently-O)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps B-K Lighting – B-K appeals from order declaring case exceptional under § 285 and awarding attorneys’ fees: B-K Lighting v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  In June 2002, I wrote an article for the New York State Bar Association Journal on LLC dissolution (read it here) in which I observed that most of the few cases decided to that point freely borrowed from corporate dissolution norms applicable in cases involving oppressed minority shareholders and internal dissension. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
Kevin's thoughtful presentations might have received more recognition in previous years, but the bar is so high. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
Kevin's thoughtful presentations might have received more recognition in previous years, but the bar is so high. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:29 am by Russ Bensing
  Last year’s went to the victim in State v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Eugene Volokh discusses religious exemptions of a different type, from mandatory autopsies for executed killers in Johnson v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  The Court of Chancery has already stated that you can’t construe Section 18-108 in light of the constraints on indemnification contained in the analogous corporate statute, Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 11:54 am by Deborah Pearlstein
Probably most striking is that in its rush to urge the Court’s engagement in the case, the dissent opens by invoking Marbury v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 10:20 am by Deborah Pearlstein
Probably most striking is that in its rush to urge the Court's engagement in the case, the dissent opens by invoking Marbury v. [read post]