Search for: "MATTER OF B B J B"
Results 4841 - 4860
of 5,815
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2012, 5:26 am
The issue is whether, under the statute, there may be, as a matter of law, and if so whether there is as a matter of fact, a retail concept in the defendants’ business, notwithstanding the Secretary’s determination. [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:12 am
The right of access extends to documents filed with the court, see Sup.R. 44(B) (defining "court records" as including "case documents," which in turn includes "information in a document submitted to a court or filed with a clerk of court in a judicial action or proceeding, including exhibits"), but the right is not limited to accessing filed documents. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:42 pm
§102(b), there is a one year grace period for disclosures by the inventor. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:02 am
I am entirely satisfied this is how Baker J approached the present case and helps to explain why I take Ms. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 12:24 pm
The context is (a) this President and (b) Twitter. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 10:28 am
As a general matter, there’s no reason to expect government officials to be filled with self-doubt about any such rules. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:35 pm
The police ought not to have pursued this matter as vigorously as it did. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 2:47 am
All the expositions revolved around the Venezuelan PIL Act, covering the topics of the system of sources, vested rights, ordre public, in rem rights, consumption contracts, punitive damages, jurisdiction matters, international labour relations, recognition and enforcement of foreign judgements, transnational provisional measures and the relations between the Venezuelan PIL Act and international arbitration matters. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 2:31 pm
Similarly, as a matter of st [read post]
16 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Why does that matter here? [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm
It hardly matters. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:26 am
Diehr, 450 U.S. 175, 187-88 (1981) (“The ‘novelty’ of any element or steps in a process, or even of the process itself, is of no relevance in determining whether the subject matter of a claim falls within the § 101 categories of possibly patentable subject matter. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm
There was one example, but it was not suited to show that the claimed subject-matter was enabled (see point [7] of the reasons), i.e. an example was in principle absent. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
Patent it – Citigroup’s patent on ‘synthetic currency transaction network’ (IP ADR Blog) USPTO seeks National Medal of Technology and Innovation nominations (Daily Dose of IP) US Patents – Decisions ITC: Initial determination in LG’s favour in Whirlpool fridge patent case (ITC 337 Law Blog) (Law360) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Amsted Industries – ITC denies motion to quash non-party… [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
J. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:35 am
And I came to know Justice William J. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 8:08 am
It states that no computer service provider "shall be held liable" for (A) good-faith acts to restrict access to, or remove, certain types of objectionable content; or (B) giving consumers tools to filter the same types of content. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 9:24 am
[B.] [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 9:23 am
(Nor, for that matter, is ‘tarnishing. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 8:24 pm
J. [read post]
