Search for: "MATTER OF B B J B"
Results 4841 - 4860
of 5,815
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2010, 6:46 am
A second National Review piece, this one by Matthew J. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Michael B. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:52 am
(f) J. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 10:03 pm
The inability to expeditiously close down businesses or companies in India often forms the subject matter of critical comment about doing business in India. [read post]
31 May 2010, 10:08 am
The text of EFF's action letter (reprinted in full below), together with an automated template for you to email a letter to your representatives in Congress can be found here.As a matter of Capitol Hill etiquette, your letter should be cc'd to the USTR, or your concerns addressed to him in the first place.EFF seems to be pretty much spot on in its analysis - it appears that US copyright holders are seeking to shift onto ISPs basically unlimited liability and the burdens… [read post]
27 May 2010, 2:51 pm
See In re: Richard J. [read post]
27 May 2010, 11:16 am
Furthermore, Fish, J. referred to of R. v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 12:08 am
Contrary to Lord Steyn’s suggestion in his lecture yesterday, this places the burden of proof on the defendant to show two things: (a) that the words were published “for the purposes of or otherwise in connection with, the discussion of a matter of public interest”; and (b) that the defendant acted responsibly in making the publication. [read post]
26 May 2010, 12:37 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0490, 2010 MT 116, IN THE MATTER OF T.J.B., A Youth Under the Age of Eighteen. [read post]
26 May 2010, 9:10 am
FEDERAL RULES – Plain Error Doctrine, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(b). [read post]
25 May 2010, 11:35 am
SCALIA, J. filed a dissenting opinion in which THOMAS, J. joined. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
& J. [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:58 pm
CAAF explained: Appellant contends that his plea to the attempt offense was improvident as a matter of law because he did not take a “substantial step” towards completing the offense. [read post]
23 May 2010, 3:11 am
For my part, I think the repetition of the words “and published” in the particulars is unnecessary. [19] The judge went on to suggest that the pleading should be subjected to the discipline of articulating (a discipline which could, perhaps, be usefully adopted in English libel cases): (a) each communication of defamatory matter (that is, each publication) sued on as a separate cause of action; (b) as to each such cause of action, and as to each defendant to that cause… [read post]
20 May 2010, 6:37 pm
It filed a cross-claim contending that there had been a non-use by Gallo of the registered trade mark in terms of section 92(4)(b) and sought removal of the registered trademark.Gallo denied the non-use claim. [read post]
20 May 2010, 5:15 am
And yes, when you order your copy, or copies from the link below, you help Mandelman Matters at the same time, because as an Amazon Affiliate, we do receive a small percentage of the books sold as a result of p [read post]
19 May 2010, 3:34 am
Cespedes v Kraja, 70 AD3d 622; Step-Murphy, LLC v B & B Bros. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:49 pm
Witness statements. b. [read post]
17 May 2010, 2:36 am
“It does not matter that the facts … may not fall within any of the circumstances described at paragraph 4(b) of the Policy. [read post]
14 May 2010, 11:28 am
This was the approach used by Gerow J. in Park, where the R. [read post]
