Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P"
Results 4841 - 4860
of 5,344
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2009, 12:01 am
P. 12(b)(6). [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 7:07 am
[b]ut there is a line where if someone, even on . . . on the Internet, publishes a false statement of fact as opposed to an opinion, then that person can and should be held responsible for their words. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 5:50 am
P. 4(b)(1)(B)(i), herebyappeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit from the Order GrantingDefendant's Motion to Dismiss Count One of the Third Superseding Indictment (Docket Entry192) entered in the above entitled matter on December 22, 2008.DATED this 7th day of January, 2009.Respectfully submitted,MATTHEW W. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 1:42 pm
If Dixon’s trial were conducted in a court using either the Federal Rules of Evidence or most state counterparts, this evidence would have been inadmissible pursuant to some version of Rule 404(b), which states that “[e]vidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 10:05 pm
Smaller corporate legal departments, fed up with the high cost of mainstream corporate matter management systems will repurpose private-firm oriented case management systems such as PracticeMaster, TimeMatters, Client Profiles, etc. to use them as matter managers … at a fraction of the cost at a time when legal department IT budgets will be slashed to the bone. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 6:51 pm
“ Justice Henry B. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
P. 23(b)(1)(A), which allows courts to certify a class when, among other things, "the prosecution of separate actions by . . . individual members of the class would create the risk of . . . inconsistent or varying adjudications . . . which would establish incompatible standards of conduct for the party opposing the class," have held that this standard is not satisfied by the risk that a defendant may be found liable for damages in one case but not liable for damages in… [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 2:55 pm
However, this is not a "sub-P"; rather, as long as there is SOME evidence of the student having attended class, this student will get a P. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 12:20 am
This is a response to Gary P. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 6:10 pm
LEXIS 97766, CV-08-267-B-W (D. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 2:30 pm
Hence, explained Justice Lemons, § 8.01-581.17 provides only a "qualified privilege similar to the privilege afforded by Rules of Court 4:1(b)(3). [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 5:40 am
As we observed in [a prior case], `[p]ersons are exposed to family members and invited guests in their own homes, but that does not mean they have opened the door to television cameras.' . . . [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 5:30 pm
(MPEP §2144.03(B)). [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 2:30 pm
" Following Johnson, Judge McGrath allowed discovery of PP&P because "it cannot be said with a certainty that these materials will not lead to the discovery of admissible evidence within the purview of Rule 4:1(b)(1) of the Rules of the Supreme Court. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 8:16 am
Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Christopher P. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
Evid. 503(d)(3)(B). [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 5:44 pm
Clearly they are brilliant because it takes a genius to handle complicated legal matters. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
US, No. 08-1634 In a suit alleging malicious prosecution by the government arising out of the prosecution of plaintiff-federal employee for false reporting, dismissal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction is vacated and cause remanded where: 1) the alleged misconduct of government investigators fell outside of the discretionary-function exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act; 2) the investigators were federal employees, not contractors; 3) no search, seizure, or arrest was necessary to… [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 8:16 am
Bradbury, 333 Or. 597, 43 P.3d 1094 (2002).Section 1. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:07 pm
Quite simply, if car passengers have no standing — ever — to protest evidence gathered in searches and seizures, no matter their legality, the effect is to "invite police officers to stop cars with passengers regardless of probable cause or reasonable suspicion of anything illegal. [read post]
