Search for: "Park v. State" Results 4841 - 4860 of 10,580
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2015, 5:58 pm by James S. Friedman, LLC
  Anthony Elonis, who was an active Facebook user, placed posts on his Facebook page that purportedly threatened patrons and employees of the park where he worked, his ex-wife, police officers, and school-age children. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:42 pm by Edward Smith
The National Highway Transportation Agency compiled statistics regarding motor vehicle v. pedestrian accidents. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 5:53 am by SHG
Ibid.; see also Wilkinson v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:26 am by Ronald Collins
Summum (2009) (applying the government speech doctrine to privately donated monuments placed in a public park). [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 2:49 pm by mdkeenan
As with most crimes, the state must prove the elements of a DUI beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm by Paul Rosner
  The court then turned to the language of the State Farm policy and held:  “Collapse” in the Policy means the substantial impairment of structural integrity of a building or part of a building that renders such building or part of a building unfit for its function or unsafe in a manner that is more than mere settling, cracking, shrinkage, bulging, or expansion.Queen Anne Park Homeowners Ass’n v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm by Bryan W. Wenter and Ronny Clausner
In essence, the CBIA’s challenge was based on the “unconstitutional conditions” doctrine from the Supreme Court of the United States’ Nollan v California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:40 am by Lyle Denniston
The majority likened a state’s program of issuing specialty or “vanity” plates to much the same kind of government activity as choosing which message-conveying monuments to allow in a public park. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 9:01 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
The Supreme Court of Montana recently addressed the issue of suing a deceased at-fault driver in the case of Locke v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:30 am by Paul Rosenzweig
Does the Los Angeles disclosure requirement conflict with Federal and State privacy law? [read post]