Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State"
Results 4841 - 4860
of 5,844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2010, 7:05 am
In Fisher v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 6:07 pm
Co. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:08 am
However, in a recent decision, Ted R. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 7:22 am
” In Ochocinska v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 3:46 pm
Regal-Beloit Corp.; Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Co. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:55 pm
"In Bazemore v Koehle, 169 A.D.2d 574, the Appellate Division decided that inasmuch as a probationary employee may be discharged without a hearing of statement of the reasons for the termination so long as the discharge is made in good faith and without any constitutionally or statutorily impermissible motive, no defamatory impression was created and the discharged provisional employee is not entitled to a name clearing hearing.On the issue of name-clearing hearings, the Commissioner… [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:52 am
(j) United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:59 pm
Gene Schlickman is a retired attorney and legislator who spent his career in public service. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
COLA's auditor also stated that Miracle Star did not provide adequate records for the audit, which caused the auditor to be unable to determine if Miracle Star had provided all specific services stated in the contract. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 1:50 am
In two separate decisions, two courts issued opinions in cases that each related in different ways to Credit-Based Asset Servicing and Securitization, LLC, also known as C-Bass. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 10:03 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am
Lee, an intellectual-property litigator and co- managing partner of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP, said of Desmarais. [read post]
30 May 2010, 2:08 pm
In Trkulja v Google Inc LLC & Anor [2010] VSC 226 (27 May 2010) the plaintiff complained about photographic images and captions produced as a result of searches on the “Google Image” service. [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:01 pm
") (citing Ozark Coal Co. v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 3:33 pm
It mirrors the “reprehensibility” factor described by the United States Supreme Court in BMW of North American, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:10 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
