Search for: "R G v. G S" Results 4841 - 4860 of 6,912
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm by Marie Louise
TTAB affirms refusal of LUVD G & Design over THE LOVED DOG for clothing (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and stra [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 2:47 pm
  Citing one of the Court’s most prominent modern rulings declining to allow a right to sue under a federal civil rights law (Alexander v. [read post]
We
14 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm by Nicholas Moline
Berring, Jr., Berkeley Law, University of California; Tom R. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:32 am by Joy Waltemath
Accordingly, the court granted the outside counsel’s motion to dismiss (Mattiaccio, G, II v DHA Group, Inc,  February 26, 2014, Kollar-Kotelly, C). [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:14 am by Abbott & Kindermann
City of Oakland (2011) 195 Cal.App.4th 884: The City's significance threshold to evaluate seismic impacts did not violate CEQA for two reasons: (1) there is no requirement that a significance threshold be formally adopted; and (2) the significance threshold used substantially conformed to the significance threshold for service impacts in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. [read post]
31 May 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Le juge s’est limité à soumettre au jury une directive simple et générale relativement à la crédibilité de ce témoin. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Ils sont protégés par la doctrine de l’exclusivité des compétences. [read post]
28 May 2014, 3:56 pm by Gustavo Arballo
Al mes siguiente también siguió la misma suerte el caso que, por accidente, ganaría el primer lugar en el rótulo: Brown v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
: G-Star v Pepsico (Class 46)   Nigeria Nigeria celebrates 20 years of copyright law (Afro-IP)   Poland Confusion around ARENDA (Class 46) Inspiration or plagiarism? [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 11:19 am by Rien Broekstra (Brinkhof)
Noteworthy is also the court’s attached weight to plaintiff’s NPE status. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 7:12 am by Laurence Lai
In full: G-VII, 5.1 – Determination of the closest prior art 6. [read post]