Search for: "State v. Character" Results 4841 - 4860 of 7,504
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2012, 1:33 pm by Steven M. Regan
On July 26, 2012, in a decision of major significance to the Marcellus Shale industry, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court in the case of Robinson Township et al. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 4:13 am by SHG
The state court actually reasoned that Mr. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 1:08 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  This leads in turn to an equally unfortunate footnote recognizing that the statement in text does not describe the state of the world: plenty of people do write their own Star Trek stories. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 10:32 am by Nerds in Court
At 19, he was known as Kimble (referencing the main character of The Fugitive), a Munich-based hacker who had cracked United States corporate PBX codes (PBX is Private Branch eXchange, a term for a phone system serving a particular office). [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 10:32 am by Nerds in Court
At 19, he was known as Kimble (referencing the main character of The Fugitive), a Munich-based hacker who had cracked United States corporate PBX codes (PBX is Private Branch eXchange, a term for a phone system serving a particular office). [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 1:36 am by Sam Murrant
In the courts RT (Zimbabwe) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 38Supreme Court: asylum seekers cannot be expected to lie or dissemble in order to achieve safety in their own country. ? [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm by INFORRM
The appeal by way of case stated in the “Twitter joke” case (Chambers v DPP) has been allowed. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:20 pm by Eugene Kontorovich
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:34 am by SHG
" News like this can't help but raise thoughts of the 1976 decision, Tarasoff v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 1:01 am by tekEditor
We’ll assume that neither the student names nor class names have a pipe ('|') character, so we'll use that as a delimiter to pack the separate pieces of information together. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm by INFORRM
It was also distinguishable from the use of private property for the purposes of collecting signatures for a petition (Appleby v United Kingdom, no. 44306/98, 6 May 2003) or the general prohibition on a ship entering the State’s territorial waters for campaigning purposes (Women on Waves v Portugal, no. 31276/05, 3 February 2009). [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
This is especially the case in view of the board’s obligations under Article 21 RPBA (OJ EPO 2007, 536). [4.3.2] G 1/03 [2.1] is of particular relevance in relation to state of the art under A 54(3). [read post]