Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 4841 - 4860
of 9,114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2018, 3:45 pm
In the first case to reach the trial stage, the US Southern District Court in New York has completed oral hearings. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 12:49 pm
United States, 961 F.3d 1343 (Fed. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 2:55 pm
District Court for the District of Maryland issued a nationwide injunction, blocking the FDA from enforcing "longstanding safety requirements for dispensing of Mifeprex, a drug indicated for termination of pregnancy during the first ten weeks. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:27 pm
” United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
at 3.The supreme court first examined section 51.003 and determined that "the statute provides an offset that otherwise would not be available. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
at 3.The supreme court first examined section 51.003 and determined that "the statute provides an offset that otherwise would not be available. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 1:30 pm
In holding section 21166 (and not section 21151) applied, the appellate court quoted from Moss v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am
Discretionary Approvals In Health First v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:27 pm
He prevailed before the district court in 2009, prompting Autodesk to appeal. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 7:03 pm
The district court agreed with the FTC. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 4:32 am
First, Kentucky’s attempt to nullify the Alien and Sedition Acts in 1798; second, South Carolina’s attempt to nullify two federal tariff laws in 1832; and third, Arkansas’s attempt to nullify Brown v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 7:15 am
The district court denied the motion for reconsideration on June 24, 2015. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 5:19 am
Thompkins habeas petition was denied in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (in Detroit).In a remarkable opinion from the United States 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, Thompkins' conviction was reversed. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 11:58 am
Pa. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 3:33 pm
The Supreme Judicial Court, agreeing with the district court, answered this question in the negative. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
The leading one he cites is Geduldig v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
The existing Indian family exception is a judicially created doctrine holding that the ICWA does not apply to those Indian children who have never been a member of an Indian home or culture and probably never would be.[14] Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians[15], many states adopted the existing Indian family exception. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:52 pm
” (Burchard v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 2:34 pm
LDG appealed the district court’s ruling to The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 11:43 am
[So the District Court in Sen. [read post]
