Search for: "State v. Mai"
Results 4841 - 4860
of 133,193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2023, 7:07 am
” State v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:21 am
So this was different from the troop of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, looting during the 16th century. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:08 am
[But v]iewpoint neutral implementation or enforcement of broad or vague terms such as "promotes or endorses social causes," "harassing," or "offensive terms" may prove difficult. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
The Comptroller adopted the Hearing Officer's decision.Petitioner then commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 challenging the Comptroller's determination.Citing Matter of Bohlen v DiNapoli, 34 NY3d 434, the Appellate Division explained the "Comptroller is vested with exclusive authority to determine applications for retirement benefits and such determination, if supported by substantial evidence, must be upheld". [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
The Comptroller adopted the Hearing Officer's decision.Petitioner then commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 challenging the Comptroller's determination.Citing Matter of Bohlen v DiNapoli, 34 NY3d 434, the Appellate Division explained the "Comptroller is vested with exclusive authority to determine applications for retirement benefits and such determination, if supported by substantial evidence, must be upheld". [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 5:51 am
” In fact, while four district court judges and the FISA Court have found backdoor searches to be constitutionally reasonable, four circuit court judges — including a unanimous Second Circuit panel in United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 5:01 am
Likewise, the Ingber v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
I usually say that this sort of an explanation may well be correct as a causal account and should certainly inform the giving of legal advice and litigation strategy, but that you can't put it in your brief.And sure enough, the briefs in Brown v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
United States X, formerly known as Twitter, has filed a federal defamat [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:08 am
For example, in Rosalba Alassini v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 1:25 am
To begin with, description amendments may add matter and lead to the inescapable added matter trap post-grant (IPKat). [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 10:30 pm
In recent years, it has become apparent that, despite the shared obligation for all Member States to adhere to the same fundamental rights standards, their practices are sometimes not in line with these standards (see for example the Dutch life long prison sentence which was not in line with Article 3 ECHR until recently (Murray v. the Netherlands, app. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
”I am among that small chunk.Last summer, I joined a large number of faculty at Amherst College in expressing our view that, “Diversity is thus more than just a ‘commendable goal’ that a college or university may or may not decide to strive for. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 6:34 pm
It is worth considering if only because it represents, in a general way, much of the thinking that is gaining increasing traction not just among developing states, but also among a certain sector of academic and policy elites in liberal democratic developed states. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 7:06 am
States’ corporate laws “compete in a market,” and Delaware may soon learn that its moves are boosting its state competitors. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 4:55 am
” The CJEU and religious dress at work On 29 November, the CJEU will hand down judgment in the latest case on religious dress at work: OP v Commune d’Ans Case C‑148/22, which is a request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du Travail de Liège. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 12:52 pm
However, others may harbor misconceptions, expecting a strict 50/50 split similar to community property states. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 9:26 am
Concerning this often raised defense, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in Woods v. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 6:12 am
After the decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
