Search for: "State v. Powers"
Results 4841 - 4860
of 36,749
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2016, 3:28 pm
Ohio State Bar Association [1] describes eminent domain as follows: “Eminent domain is the power of federal, state and local governments and even certain private companies, including railroads and utilities, to take private property and devote it to a public use. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:41 am
In Sotelo v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:24 pm
In Sullivan, et. al. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:37 am
The issue in State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:43 pm
Justice Gorsuch with opinion in Texas v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 9:57 am
From Greene v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 6:45 pm
Florida v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 9:02 pm
The issue before the Court in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:30 am
Supreme Court will consider in Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 7:46 am
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:57 am
The two Supreme Court cases that comprise the bedrock of legal precedent for the third-party doctrine—Smith v Maryland and United States v Miller—do not apply to cell site location data, the court found: We agree with the defendant…that the nature of cellular telephone technology and CSLI and the character of cellular telephone use in our current society render the third-party doctrine of Miller and Smith inapposite; the digital age has altered… [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:42 am
The Court of Appeal relied on Article 46(1)-(3) which states, at Article 46(2)(b), that the power to grant an external restraint order must be exercised “with a view to securing that there is no diminution in the value of the property identified in the external request”. [read post]
3 May 2010, 5:00 am
Last week the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals decided United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2015, 10:36 am
Vanderbloom v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:21 pm
Douglas, in Doe V. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 3:51 pm
Department of the Interior (Cultural Resources; Sacred Sites; Geothermal Projects) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html Wild Fish Conservancy v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 5:19 pm
Stephens, 574 U.S. 271, 276 (2015) (quoting United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 8:14 am
Missouri has the power to withhold state assistance, “but the means it uses to achieve its ends must be [, as the Court observed in McCulloch v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 2:50 pm
Ferguson, and Korematsu v. [read post]
