Search for: "State v. Saide"
Results 4841 - 4860
of 57,119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2012, 11:21 am
The case of R (Balding) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2007] EWCA Civ 1327 [2008] 1 WLR 564 where it was held that once a bankrupt is discharged the liability to repay the Secretary of State is also discharged was said to be rightly decided. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 11:21 am
The case of R (Balding) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2007] EWCA Civ 1327 [2008] 1 WLR 564 where it was held that once a bankrupt is discharged the liability to repay the Secretary of State is also discharged was said to be rightly decided. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:21 pm
Public.Resource.Org and its impact on opening up state-law materials; but, now is the perfect time to look a little more closely at what the Court said and why it was so good to hear. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 9:30 am
Dist. v Town of Southampton, 179 AD3d 929 and Matter of Lepper v Village of Babylon, 190 AD3d 738]. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 9:30 am
Dist. v Town of Southampton, 179 AD3d 929 and Matter of Lepper v Village of Babylon, 190 AD3d 738]. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 4:23 am
Wilder v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Yesterday, in Laffitte v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 4:41 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 7:42 am
Goliath v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 5:54 am
Bank v. [read post]
2 May 2021, 7:54 am
Under Tinker v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 2:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 4:10 am
Lawsuit dismissed for failure to specify the acts or omissions of unlawful discrimination underlying the complaintRoth v State University of New York, et. al., 2009 NY Slip Op 02829, Decided on April 14, 2009, Appellate Division, First DepartmentJeffrey Roth sued SUNY's State College of Optometry and named individuals, alleging he was the victim of unlawful discrimination. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
As the Court put it four years ago in Fisher v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 10:53 am
” Cousin said. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 10:16 pm
Here is the abstract:After Finley v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:46 am
In Hamdi v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 7:42 am
The 9th, again, said that such expert tetsimony was permitted under the abuse of discretion standard, and it allowed the jury insight into behavior.U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 5:44 am
The case, Florida v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 7:31 am
Phelps and United States v. [read post]