Search for: "State v. So"
Results 4841 - 4860
of 117,806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s 5-4 2019 decision in Rucho v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 2:53 pm
See Mayo v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 10:51 am
Cung Le v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 10:05 am
There Chief Justice John Roberts cited then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s dissent from denial of rehearing en banc in United States Telecom Assn. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 9:29 am
As Justice Antonin Scalia stressed in Verizon v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 9:05 am
Monday, the Fifth Circuit panel that decided Missouri v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 8:00 am
More specifically, in his opinion last Term dissenting from a denial of cert in Buffington v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 7:19 am
Unique lawsuits like Alienation of Affection and Criminal Conversation are still a part of the state’s legal fabric, as the Hull v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 7:08 am
Berkowitz, one of the most widely taught rape cases in the United States. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 7:08 am
Berkowitz, one of the most widely taught rape cases in the United States. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 6:59 am
A version of this argument spilled out in public in United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
” WS flew the employee to their United States office to meet with their executives in April 2015. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
” WS flew the employee to their United States office to meet with their executives in April 2015. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Guy v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 4:12 am
In People v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm
Cal.): Order re: Motion for Summary Judgment (Public Redacted Version) This here is a legal victory that should put all of that U.S. antitrust litigation from the late 2010s to rest (short of a successful appeal, but chances are so slim that I guess an appeal will not even be brought). [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
On August 24, 2023, the Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of state-law securities claims in Kirschner v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 2:30 pm
As the Sixth Circuit has stated, “[u]nlike information merely exchanged between the parties, ‘[t]he public has a strong interest in obtaining the information contained in the court record.'” See Shane Grp., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 1:25 pm
As KJK has previously covered, earlier this year, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) delivered a landmark ruling on the reach of the protections afforded by the Clean Water Act (CWA) in Sacket v. [read post]
