Search for: "State v. Stai"
Results 4841 - 4860
of 16,517
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2010, 6:20 am
Jackson, involving a $271 million judgment that was stayed by Justice Antonin Scalia in September. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 9:41 am
In Seguin v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:46 pm
Jordan In R. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:18 am
Griffith v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Zhu v. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
See SEC v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 1:14 pm
Under the Ginsberg v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 11:36 am
In the recent decision of Saadi v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 1:57 am
The States also argued that Massachusetts v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 8:57 am
Lindsay See is the solicitor general of West Virginia, which led a group of 27 other states and the governor of Kentucky in a cert-stage amicus brief in support of the petitioners in The American Legion v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Max Joseph Leser v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 2:45 pm
The court also stated that Kerner's description of the events had changed over time and seemed exaggerated. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 8:05 pm
All told, courts at various levels and state officials have stayed more than a dozen executions since Sept. 25. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 2:49 am
The decision is Case C‑441/13, Pez Hejduk v EnergieAgentur.NRW GmbH, a request for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien (Austria).The facts are as follows. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 6:27 am
Either way, the SEC is signaling, yet again, that painful pay-to-play enforcement is here to stay. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 6:27 am
Either way, the SEC is signaling, yet again, that painful pay-to-play enforcement is here to stay. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:22 pm
As will become clear, I lean towards the second option… RH v North Tyneside Council v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (HB) [2010] UKUT 462 (AAC) This was a housing benefit appeal, indeed the second HB appeal related to this matter. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:26 am
The new case is Kansas v. [read post]
28 May 2007, 10:47 am
In Schultz v. [read post]
