Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 4841 - 4860 of 10,392
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court held 5-4 that pretrial imprisonment on a new criminal charge puts a term of federal supervised release on hold. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:06 pm
  In Binder, the United States District Court for the Central District of California (the “Court”) focused on whether Plaintiffs had ownership of the trademarks and whether Defendants' use of the trademark through Google’s AdWords program was "likely to cause confusion. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 4:44 am by Edith Roberts
” The Buckeye Institute announces that it has “filed the first significant First Amendment labor-law challenge in the Supreme Court of the United States since the landmark June 27 decision in Janus v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 3:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Department of State’s Division of Licensing Services Enforcement Unit (hereinafter the Department) then began an investigation into plaintiff’s conduct. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 5:19 pm by Alex Ely
Yesterday, the Senate Judiciary Committee began the first of two day-long hearings on the nomination of Loretta Lynch to be the next Attorney General of the United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 10:46 am by Charlotte Howells and Scott J. Etish
In DR Distributors, LLC v. 21 Century Smoking, Inc., et al., United States District Judge Iain D. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 11:25 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Rowland Perkins, II, Martin Bert Carter, Mark Crosby Nevdahl, and Ryan Allan RauchCase Number: 11-cv-01962 (United States District Court for the Central District of California)Case Filed: December 21, 2011Qualifying Judgment/Order: December 10, 2014 1/27/2015 4/27/2015 2015-3 SEC vs. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 1:35 am by Liz Williams
One significant source of uncertainty is that minimum unit pricing may encourage retailers to purchase cheaper products due to the mark-up. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:47 pm by Kristin Johnson
This means that the Lanham Act, which protects against trademark infringement, does not apply outside the United States. [read post]