Search for: "Antonin Scalia" Results 4861 - 4880 of 6,601
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2011, 3:21 am by SHG
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was making a presentation to foreign dignitaries at the court a few years ago when the sound of a hammer drill erupted nearby. [read post]
6 May 2011, 11:07 am by Harold O'Grady
The first is the request by Common Cause that the Justice Department investigate whether US Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas should have recused themselves from participating in Citizen’s United v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 4:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
”  Stevens went on to chastise Justice Antonin Scalia (joined by Justice Clarence Thomas) for arguing in a separate opinion in NASA that the concept of liberty in the Due Process Clause only protects procedural, not “substantive,” rights. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:35 am by Steve Hall
Justice Antonin Scalia came in for criticism from Stevens. [read post]
3 May 2011, 2:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
  It found that test emerging from language Justice Antonin Scalia had used in the Heller decision, even though the Circuit Court acknowledged that Heller did not set a standard. [read post]
2 May 2011, 10:52 am by Lyle Denniston
  In an amusing sidelight in the case, Justice Antonin Scalia gave Wyomingites a new name: “Wyomans. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:09 am by Lyle Denniston
  Justice Clarence Thomas wrote for the Court; Justice Antonin Scalia dissented. [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:17 am by James Bickford
  The National Journal reports that Justice Sotomayor compared herself to Justice Antonin Scalia—both are, per her description, “[l]oud, boisterous, in-your-face. [read post]
1 May 2011, 1:58 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority, noted that the Federal Arbitration Act, which bars states from discriminating against arbitration, was passed in 1925 in response to judges' "hostility" to such agreements. [read post]
1 May 2011, 10:34 am by Law Lady
Supreme Court has sided with AT&T in its bid to enforce contract provisions banning class actions and requiring individual arbitration in consumer disputes.The Federal Arbitration Act pre-empts a California common-law rule that allowed some consumers to avoid contracts in which they waived their class action rights, the court ruled in an opinion (PDF) by Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 2:33 am
., Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the majority opinion which ruled that a California couple who sued over an AT&T Mobility bill could not bring their claim as a class action, but were required to submit their individual claim to the federal arbitration process. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:15 pm by Eugene Lee
., Inc. as one of the worst decisions in recent memory to come from the Supreme Court’s conservative faction (Chief Justice Roberts and Associate Justices Antonin Scalia, Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Anthony Kennedy). [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:36 am by Ashby Jones
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court, in an opinion written by Justice Antonin Scalia, agreed with that analysis, ruling that the company can enforce a contract provision that requires customers to arbitrate their disputes individually. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:09 am by Lyle Denniston
Analysis When Justice Antonin Scalia stands on the edge of a constitutional slope that he considers to be especially slippery, he can be a formidable barrier to anybody else attempting to take the slide. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:02 am
Supreme Court in an argued case: Justice Antonin Scalia delivered the opinion of the Court in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 2:34 am
Justice Antonin Scalia has said, “I don’t see how you can hold them [generic drug companies] liable. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 7:33 pm by webmaster
Concepcion majority opinion was written by Justice Antonin Scalia, often celebrated in Federalist Society circles as an advocate for state autonomy. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 2:13 pm by Lyle Denniston
   As Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in 1984, when he was a judge on a federal appeals court, “they wield those powers not as private citizens but only through the public office which they hold. [read post]