Search for: "Deal v. Deal" Results 4861 - 4880 of 38,535
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2016, 1:55 am
Hoffmann-La Roche AG and Genentech Inc. | Design v Copyright in Italy | Unitary patent and double patenting | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd & Anor | IKEA in Indonesia | Eli Lilly v Janssen Sciences.Never too late 83 [week ending on Sunday 14 February] – Indigenous IP | Arnold J's latest judgment flags down the iconic London black cab | Life of a national/EU trade mark ... in a map | A comprehensive… [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 11:43 am by NL
X, Y & Z v the United Kingdom – 32666/10 [2011] ECHR 1199The long and sorry story of X & Y v Hounslow appears to have reached an end. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 11:43 am by NL
X, Y & Z v the United Kingdom – 32666/10 [2011] ECHR 1199The long and sorry story of X & Y v Hounslow appears to have reached an end. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 3:53 am by MARY EVENDEN
The Supreme Court handed down judgment in N v ACCG & Ors [2017] UKSC 22 on 22 Mar 2017. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 7:30 am by Adam Thierer
[v] (See Exhibit 7) And NBC Universal’s stable of programming, while impressive, is a mere trickle in an ocean of content that consumers can choose from. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 1:17 am
CNNMoney.com is reporting that German software giant SAP AG (SAP) and rival Oracle Corp. [read post]
Walker v Innospec Ltd – The UK Supreme Court Disapplies a Statutory Provision on the Grounds of Incompatibility with EU Equality Law Last week’s decision of the UK Supreme Court in the same-sex pension rights case of Walker v Innospec Ltd [2017] UKSC 47 generated plenty of excited commentary in the UK media. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:54 pm by INFORRM
On completion of the deal, he tweeted that “the bird is freed. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 10:57 am by MOTP
Although this case deals with attorney’s fees awarded through a sanctions order, the distinction is immaterial because all feeshifting situations require reasonableness. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 4:28 am by Scott Bomboy
So how would the Constitution deal with such an unusual situation? [read post]