Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 4861 - 4880
of 7,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2012, 1:18 am
MM and AO (A Child), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 668 The Secretary of State acted lawfully in not ordering an independent inquiry into the 2009 protest at the Immigration Detention Centre. [read post]
20 May 2012, 11:47 pm
Related posts: Franzina on Negrepontis v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 6:09 am
Courts unhesitatingly pronounce on the legality or otherwise of foreign states’ actions - Abbasi v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 2:00 am
In MGN v United Kingdom, on balancing Article 8 and 10 rights, the Strasbourg Court stated (§142): The balancing of individual interests, which may well be contradictory, is a difficult matter and Contracting States must have a broad margin of appreciation in this respect since the national authorities are in principle better placed than this Court to assess whether or not there is a “pressing social need” capable of justifying an interference with one of… [read post]
18 May 2012, 7:48 am
See Samaniego v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:00 am
In Plain English: Cambridge University Press v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 8:59 pm
-> It's Tinkerers v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 3:01 am
Virtual reality has evolved from a paradox to a well-understood expression in colloquial English, but that wasn't much comfort for Really Virtual. [read post]
16 May 2012, 8:44 am
IN PLAIN ENGLISH: At issue in Hall v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 5:03 pm
Despite the plethora of offences that apply to the media, there is no overarching public interest defence in English law. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:45 am
Latif v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
The Libel Reform campaign, a coalition between English PEN, Sense About Science and Index on Censorship, has welcomed the inclusion of the defamation bill in the Queen’s Speech and publishes various reactions here. [read post]
13 May 2012, 9:30 pm
The Article explains that Massachusetts managed by gradually integrating the distinctive elements of English equity into its common law courts. [read post]
13 May 2012, 2:02 pm
She considers such cases as Hatton v United Kingdom, Lopez Ostra v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 9:36 am
These vary from state to state but generally include fraud or non-disclosure of such information as mental illness, venereal disease, another marriage; impotency; and being under the legal age for marriage within that jurisdiction. (3) Legal annulments differ from religious annulments. [read post]
13 May 2012, 8:20 am
The Press Statement states that "The General Court correctly analysed whether the earlier BOTOX marks had a reputation with the general public and health-care professionals in the UK on the basis of the evidence adduced by Allergan, such as press articles published in scientific journals or English daily newspapers and the inclusion of the word ‘BOTOX’ in English dictionaries. [read post]
12 May 2012, 4:11 am
(2) If the court should have examined whether to refuse enforcement under Section 48(1)(a) for the reasons stated, has the Delhi High Court impliedly followed the Supreme Court in reading public policy in a wider manner (See, Phulchand Exports Ltd. v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 6:52 am
As stated in the Krimstock Order, the Department must provide notice of the right to a retention hearing in two distinct ways: Notice of the right to a hearing will be provided at the time of seizure by attaching to the [Property Clerk’s] voucher already provided to the person from whom a vehicle is seized a notice, in English and Spanish, as set forth below. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:02 am
Due to on-going controversies it was not published in English until 1991. [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:52 pm
The name-calling consisted of derogatory slurs for homosexuals in Spanish, and in Italian and English. [read post]
