Search for: "English v. English" Results 4861 - 4880 of 11,200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2014, 7:05 am by Jordan Bublick
Supreme Court was presented with the use of "substanially" in the context of "substantially burden[ing] a person's exercise of religion"  Burwell v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 5:14 am by Hayleigh Bosher
AQ is in based in Qatar, and has 128 offices in 73 different countries and approximately 46,000 staff worldwide, including Vice President Legal at QA, Mr Rehan Akram, who is a graduate of the University of Cambridge and qualified as an English solicitor. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Dupate v Latvia ([2020] ECHR 819) the Fifth Section of the European Court of Human Rights held that the publication of covertly taken photographs of the partner of a politician leaving hospital with her newborn baby was a violation of her Article 8 rights. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:01 pm
The attempt by the taxpayer in this case is reminiscent of the tax avoidance transactions that shaped English law in the 80s, and in particular, of the judgment of the House of Lords in IRC v Burmah Oil. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 2:02 am by INFORRM
Do we trust the English courts so little as to readily assume its wording has set the path to abuse? [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:00 am by Adam Wagner
: Liberty continue their excellent Guardian series answering common human rights questions. 16 July | Mousa & Ors v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor: Public Interest Lawyers have won permission on behalf of 100 Iraqis to bring judicial review proceedings against the Government, alleging that they were ill-treated in detention in Iraq at various times between 2003 and 2008 by members of the British Armed forces in breach of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human… [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
  https://t.co/DZsJJ1JQeA -> CASL Anti-Spam Legislation – Will it Actually Halt Spam https://t.co/Zys0ALSlbj -> Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:03 am
The judge's comments on spiking are therefore obiter only, but of interest nonetheless.In looking at the position if the liability issues had been governed by English law, the judge reviewed the decision in Phillips v Syndicate 992 Gunner ([2004] LRIR 426). [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:58 am by Lawrence Solum
In particular, it examines the issues in two English cases, Ladele v London Borough of Islington and McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd, in which professionals lost their jobs because they had a conscientious, and faith-based, objection to providing a particular kind of service to gay and lesbian couples. [read post]
2 May 2010, 9:31 am by INFORRM
   It has recently been recognised as being an aspect of the Article 10 right to freedom of expression (last year in the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union case Tarsasag a Szabadsagjogokert v Hungary) and even more recently by the English Courts (this year in A v Independent News & Media Limited & Ors [2010] EWCA 343, discussed on this blog by Dan Tench). [read post]