Search for: "English v. English" Results 4861 - 4880 of 11,200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2016, 2:40 pm by Molly Runkle
This morning the Court granted review in United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 6:08 am by Nassiri Law
Also, many construction workers are not fluent in English, and employers use the language barrier as means to take advantage of workers. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:12 am
The case raises and answers an interesting question: under English law, does an assignment of a patent (other than by deed) require consideration? [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 7:44 am by Joy Waltemath
Furthermore, summary judgment was properly granted on the breach of contract claim because the anti-discrimination policy, which contained only general language, did not create a binding contract (Tourtellotte v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am by INFORRM
English PEN are working with the International Press Institute to campaign for an end to criminal defamation in Europe. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 5:49 am
 It was most likely some classic tort or contract case (see Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Bomb or Caparo v Dickman). [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 9:00 pm by Carey Sias
Crevor, 3 Binney 121 (1810); Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:11 am by Ben
His main articles in English language are accessible via SSRN (ssrn.com/author=1697918). [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 5:38 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Friedrichs v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:08 pm by Amy Howe
California Teachers Association in Plain English. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 11:57 am
" Plaintiff contends that it is "common knowledge that the English translations of VENTUS and VENTO are the same. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 9:11 am
This Kat was perusing the excellent IPDraughts blog the other day, and read this report of an interesting case Wright Hassall LLP v Horton Jr & Anor [2015] EWHC 3716 (QB), which is a bit of an oddity - it is basically a solicitor negligence case, brought about by the solicitor claiming for unpaid fees, and the client counterclaiming for negligence. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 8:16 am by Randy Barnett
But one consistently applied rule is particularly germane: The offspring of the King were natural born subjects of the King regardless of where they were born, whether on English territory or not. [read post]