Search for: "Generics International (US), Inc." Results 4861 - 4880 of 9,130
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2014, 8:12 am by WIMS
April 29-30, 2014 Columbus, OhioWaste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  While an imperfect panacea to the rising risks of retaliation claims and liabilities, examples of some of the steps businesses generally will want to use to prevent and mitigate etaliation exposures include: Establish and clearly communicate by word and deed that the Company prohibits retaliation. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 1:57 pm by Nikki Siesel
Disney filed a lawsuit in a California Federal Court, Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The defendants argued that the trial judge had taken a holistic approach to assessment of infringement and that the Court should instead apply an approach similar to the “abstraction-filtration-comparison” approach used to assess substantiality in the context of computer software infringement in the United States per Computer Associates International, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:06 am by Peter Mahler
 These agreements often derive from generic forms grabbed off the internet, including forms offered by paid services such as LegalZoom, or from recycled, one-size-fits-all forms used by attorneys without paying meaningful attention to the special considerations and needs attendant to the particular business being formed. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
Pub Squash Co copied the drink itself and the general theme and tone of the marketing campaign. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 8:56 am
General Cigar Co., Inc., Appeal No. 13-1465 (Cancellation No. 92025859). [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 8:29 am by WIMS
Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 3:57 am by Terry Hart
One of the most relevant and thorough is US v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 12:05 pm by Guest Author for TradeSecretsLaw.com
 General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc., 637 F.3d 1047 (9th Cir. 2011), the employee removed vast amounts of confidential information from the company, including attorney-client privileged communications, trade secrets, internal research and development information, sensitive government information and documents under a secrecy order. [read post]