Search for: "German v. German"
Results 4861 - 4880
of 5,202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2008, 11:16 am
In UMG Recordings v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: Nine v IceTV: (International Law Office) Benelux Some new rules of the Director-General of the Benelux Organisation for Intellectual Property with regard to trade mark filings refused on absolute grounds and withdrawal of oppositions: (Class 46) Brazil Brazil exports agricultural technology to developing world: (IP tango) Canada Conservatives website faces claims of copyright infringement: (Michael Geist), Canada’s trade mark opposition practice… [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 8:00 am
KG, et al. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 9:15 pm
" The authors take exception to the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-144/04 Werner Mangold v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:37 pm
If you remember, Thomas and Pamela McIntosh v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:37 pm
If you remember, Thomas and Pamela McIntosh v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 10:28 am
This piece charts the old British Catnic/Improver test against its German counterpart, the Schneidmesser test, with some fascinating results.The Kat was also glad to spot a dissertation by a rather younger friend James Tumbridge (Gowlings) on whether the Canadian Supreme Court has anything to teach the British -- with their tiny quantity of case law on famous marks -- on a subject that will not develop much in this country until the Court of Appeal for England and Wales, armed with the… [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 9:04 am
Travis D. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 10:51 am
Elektra v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 12:04 am
The legislation holds mortgage buyers like Freddie liable in ways that "we have no way of monitoring and preventing," Brad German, a company spokesman, said.It's not clear how many such loans would be made even if Freddie Mac was willing to buy them: the state law will almost certainly be preempted as to federal lenders, and in the past, lenders have tended to avoid loans labeled as high-interest loans, thus making mini-HOEPA laws effectively usury statutes. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 6:23 pm
In a heroic move, the Germans spiked the deal, saving us from ourselves. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 2:40 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 7:59 am
A silver medal goes to Michael's post on DeJohn v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 5:33 pm
Though he concentrates on the common law world, he does not ignore French, Dutch and German thought either. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 4:00 pm
In Muller v. [read post]
Wired.com reports that Judge Davis indicated he is likely to declare a mistrial in Capitol v. Thomas
4 Aug 2008, 2:31 pm
Thomas.Judge Hints at Mistrial in RIAA v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 12:52 pm
The Delhi High Court delivered a salient ruling earlier this month in Phonographic Performance Limited v Hotel Gold Regency and others (MANU/DE/0942/2008), on which Mustafa says:"In a landmark decision, Phonographic Performance Limited v Hotel Gold Regency and others, the Delhi High Court held that copyright societies such as PPL, representing the interest of the music companies, cannot initiate copyright infringement actions to protect the interest of their members against… [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 6:52 pm
In Mohanty v. [read post]
