Search for: "Givens v. Givens"
Results 4861 - 4880
of 67,529
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2015, 4:05 am
In Mbuyi v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 12:06 pm
In United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:59 am
VirtualAgility, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:00 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), a federal lawsuit was filed against the Walmart store in Bullhead City, Arizona, for failing to reasonably accommodate an employee who suffered from a seizure disorder.Apparently, given her disability, the employee requested that her absences be excused, but the company (after about two months), declined to do so and eventually fired her.Believing that such conduct violated the Americans with Disabilities Act and the ADA Amendments Act, the… [read post]
2 May 2024, 3:47 pm
Part V concludes. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 9:16 am
Not a surprising ruling given the Fifth Circuit's stance and Texas courts' acceptance of the spurious "third-party doctrine" - a US Supreme Court-created loophole to the Fourth Amendment manufactured in the '70s. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 12:35 pm
On Wednesday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted Qualcomm's motion to expedite its appeal of the FTC v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:05 am
In Theodorou and Tsotsorou v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
In State of Minnesota v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 6:33 am
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 3:44 pm
What Caused the Dispute Between the Attorneys In the case of Ryan v. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 9:57 am
It’s been nearly 10 years since plaintiff in Camicia v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:28 am
The post FTC v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 11:46 am
State v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 10:27 am
Bank v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 4:22 pm
He was given the refusal warning and still refused to submit to the test. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 6:53 am
Teaching Moore v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 10:01 am
In Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 12:02 pm
In Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 8:26 am
Pardon the Jimi Hendrix allusion, but it seemed appropriate given yesterday’s Supreme Court decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
