Search for: "House v. House" Results 4861 - 4880 of 41,326
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2016, 11:03 am by Giles Peaker
This argument would seem to be clear from the judgments of the Court of Appeal and the House of Lords in White and White v Riverside Housing Association Ltd [2005] EWCA Civ 1385; [2006] HLR 15 and [2007] UKHL 20; [2007] HLR 31. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 7:30 am by Daniel Carpenter-Gold
Photo from Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0).On Monday, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit issued a ruling in California Restaurant Association v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 6:59 am by J. Gordon Hylton
The conflicting positions of the two houses were reconciled by House Speaker Henry Clay in what came to be known as the Missouri Compromise. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 2:04 am by Dave
(note: see now the Social Security (Notification of Changes in Circumstances) Regulations SI 2001/3252, Reg 4(1C), added by Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2010/2449, reg 7(3)). [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 2:04 am by Dave
(note: see now the Social Security (Notification of Changes in Circumstances) Regulations SI 2001/3252, Reg 4(1C), added by Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2010/2449, reg 7(3)). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 6:28 pm by Ilya Somin
We also explain how to get deal with the badly flawed 1926 ruling in Village of Euclid v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 1:31 pm by Giles Peaker
 Port of London Authority v Paul Mendoza [2017] UKUT 146 (TCC). [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 1:21 pm by Giles Peaker
Samuels v Birmingham City Council (2019) UKSC 28 The Supreme Court, finally, has delivered its judgment on the issue of the assessment of ‘reasonable expenses’ when considering the affordability of rent in homelessness decisions. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 12:42 pm by Giles Peaker
by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 6:04 pm
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a decision by the district court that found a property owner was not bound by a restriction contained in an old subdivision and that the Town had violated the property owners' rights by refusing to issue a certificate of occupancy for a house on the property (O'Mara v Town of Wappinger). [read post]
The US Supreme Court heard its final oral arguments of the year on Wednesday in the consolidated case of Collins v. [read post]