Search for: "IN RE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS"
Results 4861 - 4880
of 7,564
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2013, 1:15 pm
In many areas of public policy, officials are increasingly insistent on the need for careful analysis of the consequences of their decisions, and on the importance of relying not on intuitions and anecdotes, but on evidence and data. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 11:00 am
NDAA Watch: We’re still waiting for its passage. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 8:15 am
Campbell, JudgeRepresenting Appellant: Office of the State Public Defender: Diane Lozano, State Public Defender; Tina N. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:34 am
re-used by domestic agencies such as the Drug Enforcement Agency, effectively bypassing the checks and balances imposed on such domestic agencies. [read post]
ARDC Review Board Recommends A Three Year Suspension For Lawyer Who Attacked the Integrity of Judges
16 Dec 2013, 5:29 pm
This is a decision of the ARDC Review Board recommending a three-year suspension for a lawyer who attacked the integrity of four judges. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 7:44 am
I suspect plan administrators will check their existing plans for limitations provisions and adding them or altering them based on today's decision (and including them in future plans).Image: The image is Justice Thomas' official portrait and is in the public domain as a work of the federal government. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 4:48 pm
A decision is required, even if the official is still left with the power to decide “yes” or “no” about what is being sought. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 3:40 pm
I'm of two minds regarding Judge David Peeple's decision to allow Rosemary Lehmberg to remain in office as Travis County District Attorney following her DWI arrest earlier this year:On one hand, I agree she shouldn't be removed because other public officials don't routinely get removed from office because of a Class B misdemeanor.OTOH, I cannot fathom why she would want to remain in office and endure the public humiliation that this trial has put her through. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 11:02 am
May 13, 2009); a delay of 10 months, see In re Eliot, S.Ct. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 9:41 am
At stake for the Qimonda estate was approximately $47 million in estimated re-licensing fees. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 6:41 am
At stake for the Qimonda estate was approximately $47 million in estimated re-licensing fees. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 11:24 am
See, e.g., Maryland AG’s deal with Facebook (“Facebook Opens Takedown Hotline for Public School Officials“), and the lawsuits by principals and administrators against students that we’ve blogged about repeatedly (the Matot case was the latest iteration). [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
Do I need to re-apply? [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 3:42 pm
A lot has happened since Monday night, when I posted a blog on the case which we now know as Re P (A Child). [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 6:53 am
The only way to square this circle is to make the rules public and to demonstrate to the public that the rules are obeyed. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:03 pm
” Further legal arguments were that the Ninth Circuit decision conflicts with prior Supreme Court rulings on access to military bases, and with decisions by other courts of appeals. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 3:42 pm
” Also joining in was the official twitter account of the judiciary (@Judiciaryuk) had tweeted that the case was ongoing, had been transferred to the President of the Family Division and was now to be heard in the High Court. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 2:44 am
I'll listen to the official recording, which will become available a few hours after the hearing, and share my observations. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:00 am
Union Station officials said that hundreds of people have donated dishes in recent years and that many have called or sent in emails complaining about the decision. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 4:24 am
We grow less tolerant, that is, except when an event like the Boston Marathon bombing happens, when we immediately want to know why the government did not do more and know more and act earlier and more decisively. [read post]
