Search for: "In Re: Does v."
Results 4861 - 4880
of 30,602
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2020, 2:08 pm
So the Legislature bothered to set a relatively short (60 day) deadline for your typical attorney fee request, but if you're seeking postjudgment fees (as parties often do), there's no deadline -- much less a short one -- at all? [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 4:53 pm
In Re Polymerica, LLC, No. 08-1064 (Tex. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm
Those cotton-tipped swabs aren't labeled for removing ear wax.Physicians are permitted to make off-label use of drugs and devices and, to our eyes, off-label use does not affect the preemption analysis.First, Riegel v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:28 am
The first article in the issue is titled “Plessy v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:28 am
The first article in the issue is titled “Plessy v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 9:30 pm
Late last week, Dave shared that the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, in National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 10:01 am
But, last Friday, the Court did request full briefing in the merits in Brookshire Grocery Co. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 11:43 am
In Witt v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 5:15 am
In re Subpoena of Daniel Drasin, supra. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 9:13 pm
To the extent that our predecessor court inserted such a requirement into § 102(g) in In re Clemens, we discontinued that requirement as dictum in E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
The Eighth Circuit also referred to its opinion in Hood v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:13 am
Unfortunately, the waters were once again made murky as a result of the 2008 ruling by the Federal Circuit in In re Bilski. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 4:26 pm
A recent guest on the Class Re-Action podcast concluded that Rule 68 claims were underutilized. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 10:31 pm
(Jim Lindgren) Does the Wisconsin Senate have the power to compel absent Democratic senators to return to the senate floor if they re-enter the state of Wisconsin? [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 4:38 pm
They're busy. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 2:39 pm
Not especially.But when you're the only witness on your behalf, and when this is what you have to say, you're going to stay in. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 10:31 am
We're not granting any more. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 2:29 pm
But regardless of whether it's "in style" or not, it definitely does constitute something else. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 2:54 pm
Smith v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 5:03 am
Ohio Aug. 16, 2016); Doe v. [read post]
