Search for: "In re A. V."
Results 4861 - 4880
of 62,920
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2008, 2:42 pm
In a unanimous decision in the case, Palmore v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 2:28 pm
Following the remand in Michigan v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 10:55 am
My students sometimes ask me why we read dissents, since they're not the law. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 1:49 pm
We know they're making sausage in there. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 1:27 pm
. 'Cause when you stop that guy at a park, and he's got that stuff in his pocket, that pretty much proves he's the one you're after, right? [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 10:48 am
Nonetheless, here's something to think about as the new week begins.You're on the district court. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 10:45 am
Let's say you're an illegal alien. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 6:19 am
Citing Hale v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 11:00 am
Yet in the case of Charles Comer v. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 9:25 am
., v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 12:57 pm
The majority of which merely recites the facts and history of the case: the reasoning itself entails a mere three pages of text.What the trial court says below is exactly what you're looking for if you're on the losing end of its decision. [read post]
19 May 2023, 1:18 pm
If you're especially interested in arcane procedural issues regarding what exactly you have to plead in order to asset removal under a particular (relatively uncommon) federal statute, the jurisdictional fight between the majority and dissent in this opinion might interest you. [read post]
19 May 2016, 12:54 pm
They're not parties. [read post]
17 May 2021, 12:26 pm
You're looking to continue the streak. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 12:15 pm
But if you're willing to run a 10% (5%? [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 11:30 am
You're a 14 year old kid. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 1:07 pm
You're having a great time. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 12:26 pm
When you're dealing with what seems like a routine thing -- a hardship request -- I doubt whether the grand jurors think that having the prosecutor say "That's fine, you're excused" is anything more than a pure administrative function. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 12:13 pm
Sometimes cases are worth mentioning not because they're particularly interesting, but rather simply because they might be helpful to the reader.Which is why I mention this one.The relevant part of the holding is a simple one: You're allowed to incorporate by reference prior motions and supporting evidence. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 4:48 pm
You’re going to snip the sensor tags off the merchandise. [read post]
