Search for: "In re Faith S."
Results 4861 - 4880
of 11,706
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2016, 3:46 am
"There was no evidence of bad faith on opposer's part, nor any specific prejudice to applicant beyond mere delay.On balance, however, the Board found that opposer had failed to show excusable neglect that would warrant proceeding any further with the case.And so the Board granted the motion and dismissed the opposition with prejudice.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: Once the testimony period closes, a party is up the creek without a paddle.Text… [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 3:22 am
Playing to that small audience of blind faith suggests the argument is unserious, and Cohen is merely taking this stance to appease an interest group. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:34 pm
Where there’s smoke, there’s fire: The state-tribal quandary of tribal marijuana. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 6:49 pm
President Johnson wouldn't run for re-election. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 8:04 am
Consumer Reports gets full 1A protection for saying Hoover is the best vacuum, but when Hoover quotes that it doesn’t b/c they’re proposing a commercial transaction—exact same speech to exact same people, burdened separately b/c of speaker’s motivation. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 10:00 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, a 2009 case in which they determined that attorney's fees may be awarded in cases of bad faith. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 8:21 am
In In Re M-I, LLC d/b/a M-I Swaco, NOV argued that as a party to the lawsuit where it was accused of stealing trade secrets from M-I Swaco, it had a right to be present at a temporary injunction hearing and hear what trade secrets M-I Swaco claimed NOV misappropriated. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:26 pm
So it's not just that the people I am talking about are either losing their faith, or are turned off by professions of faith, or whatever.It is that one can see their minds going, going, going... until they are gone. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:40 am
Has more faith in other limiting doctrines/moves than in functionality. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
This is not justice.Translation: From where we’re sitting.In fact, HB 1947 actually excludes most victims. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 5:35 pm
It’s that simple. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 11:24 am
It’s not shocking. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 9:39 am
That’s not a hard-and-fast rule, but a good practice tip. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:36 am
After three hung juries, if the prosecutor says we’re going to retry him one more time, would that be the time for a court to say, no you’re not? [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 1:30 am
" "Plaintiffs do not seek to re-litigate the condition of Jahi’s brain function in 2013, over two years ago, but instead request this Court to be the first court to consider whether or not, as of this date, Jahi exhibits some function of some portion of her brain. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:24 pm
Second Circuit (en banc): The agents acted in good-faith reliance on a valid warrant, so we’re not going to address the constitutional issue. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 11:44 am
It’s not all that complicated in principle. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:45 am
Even if they’re not the *most* powerful players, it’s not okay for prosecutors to break the law or violate the Constitution. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 10:08 am
The SCOV says despite any other stuff the trial court might’ve said, at base level it’s a discretionary ruling and that’s how we’re going to review it. [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 8:23 am
The Section welcomes the SPC’s clarification in Article 22 that, as a default rule, the statutory right of first refusal should not apply to transfers on account of a shareholder’s death. [read post]
