Search for: "Label v Label"
Results 4861 - 4880
of 13,304
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2015, 9:28 pm
Fructher v Zoning Board of Appeals of Town of Hurley, 2015 WL 7460160 (NYAD 3 Dept. 11/25/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Special Use/Exception [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 5:50 pm
Alston v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 1:52 pm
The current iteration of the religious-freedom challenge to the Affordable Care Act’s preventive-services mandate (not, as is sometimes suggested, to the act itself) is called Zubik v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 1:07 pm
V, § 3(b)(10), Fla. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 11:54 am
Cir. 2010); King Pharm., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 4:33 am
That they argue amongst themselves about who ultimately pays is okay, so long as Sheik's receipt of medical care and wage loss were not impaired while they fiddled around for nearly 9 years (there's indication that Zurich did provide some benefits).The California Supreme Court said it most succinctly: “The label placed by the parties on their relationship is not dispositive, and subterfuges are not countenanced. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 6:44 am
The court again noted the secret tape recordings of marital counseling, his attempt to get his wife charged with perjury, his hanging out with a cocaine dealer, his behavior toward the former chief of police, and his possession of empty steroid vials, some of which were labeled in foreign languages or labeled “for veterinary use only. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 12:48 pm
Supreme Court in Walling v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:31 am
The Pacira Pharmaceutical Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:31 am
The Pacira Pharmaceutical Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:26 am
As the plaintiff, the entity can choose the forum in which to sue, and given the Caronia v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 1:28 pm
This came squarely into play last week in Dougherty v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 11:08 am
With its last opinion of 2015, the Justices added DIRECTV v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 7:05 am
” These assertions are obviously untenable in light of Article V case law and precedent, but writers on the subject had not looked for much Article V law or precedent. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 6:27 pm
In Verticor, Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 3:24 pm
Marty v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
” Gertz v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:18 am
A Rock River Arms AR-15 rifle — often labeled an assault rifle. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 3:58 am
The Plaintiffs contend the reason that PHH deleted this provision is due to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 5:30 pm
Over on LXBN, Zosha writes on the case against some of the FDA’s labeling guidelines. [read post]
