Search for: "Laws v. Laws" Results 4861 - 4880 of 269,267
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Lorentzen (Michigan law mandating 20 years’ imprisonment for sale of marijuana ruled cruel and unusual under state and federal constitutions); People v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am by INFORRM
Media law in other jurisdictions Australia On 30 April 2024, the Supreme Court of Victoria handed down judgement in the case of Tziotzis v Nine Entertainment Co Pty Ltd [2024] VSC 203. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
(Forthcoming)).Abubakar Yusuf Mamud, Ummah: a Holistic Framework for Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism in Nigeria, (March 16, 2024).Neil James Foster, Liability of a Bishop for Sexual Abuse Committed by Clergy: Bird v DP (A Pseudonym). [read post]
6 May 2024, 3:32 am by Peter J. Sluka
  Under New York law, a testifying expert can rely on hearsay as a basis for his opinion only where (1) the out-of-court material is of a kind accepted in the profession as reliable as a basis in forming a professional opinion, and (2) there is evidence presented establishing the reliability of the out-of-court material referred to by the witness (Hambsch v New York City Tr. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
[V]iolent protest is not protected; peaceful protest is. [read post]
5 May 2024, 7:31 pm by Francis Pileggi
The titular topic is addressed in the recent Chancery decision of McRitchie v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 7:11 pm by Francis Pileggi
The en banc high court partially reversed a Court of Chancery decision that the derivative suit must be dismissed because IAC met the requirements of independence set by the milestone opinion in Kahn v. [read post]
As such, trademark law prevents unfair competition which can be damaging to businesses. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:44 am by Eric Goldman
In sum, a defendant like Freed must have actual authority rooted in written law or longstanding custom to speak for the State. [read post]
5 May 2024, 8:32 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Over to the team to report on Edwards Lifesciences v Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences (UPC_CFI_249/2023:"The Edwards Lifesciences v Meril preliminary injunction (PI) proceedings at the UPC on EP 3 763 331 protecting a “Prosthetic valve crimping device” (see here) started with a bang (or should this UPCKat say, crimp?) [read post]