Search for: "Light v. United States"
Results 4861 - 4880
of 11,313
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2011, 8:41 am
In light of the recent decision in Shelton v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 1:49 am
United States, 10-5296, and Vazquez v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am
LSI Corporation, No. 19-337 (state sovereign immunity against IPR challenge) Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 8:50 pm
Another example of a court order that first approved a transfer of structured settlement payment rights, and later was declared ineffective, comes from the opinion of the United States District Court in Maryland, in a case captioned Rapid Settlements, Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 8:48 pm
It actually makes little sense in light of history and in light of how property law works today. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 11:51 am
United States 21-1347Issue: Whether, when reviewing a suppression ruling on appeal, the appellate court should review factual findings for clear error and the ultimate legal determination de novo, as six circuits do, or whether it should also view the evidence in the light most favorable to the district court’s ruling, as the U.S. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 5:34 am
§ 240.10b-5.In doing so, the Second Circuit addressed the gap left by the United States Supreme Court in Merck & Co. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 3:21 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 7:46 am
Plaintiff sought reconsideration in light of the United States Secretary of Labor’s amicus curiae brief filed in In re Novartis Wage and Hour Litigation. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 7:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 1:55 pm
AT& T Mobility LLC., the United States District Court for the Northern District of California agreed with the conclusion of the court in Quevedo v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 5:24 am
United States, 487 U.S. 250, 254 (1988); Thomas v. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 2:49 pm
” The appellate court relied on federal courts’ interpretations of federal antitrust law, including the United States Supreme Court decision in Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 11:29 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
United States, the Court held that new Fourth Amendment precedent must apply retroactively. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 6:01 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:45 am
Whether, in light of this Court’s holding in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:52 am
Mesa, which “asks whether there is a remedy for a Mexican citizen killed when a Border Patrol agent in the United States opens fire on someone in Mexico,” and Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 5:23 pm
Revisiting precedent is particularly appropriate where, as here, a departure would not upset settled expectations, see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:48 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
