Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption"
Results 4861 - 4880
of 22,050
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2014, 5:45 pm
So if the Court adopts a middle-ground rule, it should pay attention to all three questions and how they interact. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm
§§6501 – 6523, and adopted by reference in Minnesota law (Minn. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 10:42 am
It does not matter what gender either parent is. [read post]
24 May 2021, 10:03 am
The Regulation would also require Member States to adopt measures benefitting small-scale providers and start-ups, such as priority access to the regulatory sandboxes and support in complying with the Regulation and other EU rules. [read post]
9 May 2010, 11:56 pm
Indeed, I think it’s quite likely that today’s Supreme Court would be willing to adopt as a matter of constitutional law pretty much what the Administration wants as a matter of policy without any legislation. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 4:38 am
Every prior case in which the Court has condemned racial balancing arose in the context of a race-based affirmative action program or its equivalent, giving the Court no occasion to rule on race-neutral means of fostering racial diversity. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 2:30 pm
Resources Code, § 21082), as a matter of practice not all agencies do. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:52 am
From what I can tell, the plaintiffs’ bar has been much more active in trying to encourage federal judges to adopt a forgiving interpretation of Rule 702, and especially in trying to preserve liberal admissibility standards in the states. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 10:52 am
It will also consider the constitutionality of Congress’ delegation of certain authority to the SEC relating to rules and regulations that the SEC has considered or adopted, and the SEC’s discretionary authority to make determinations on policy matters where Congress has not provided sufficient guidance. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 11:06 am
” Second, the Court has proven unwilling to privilege practical concerns flowing from an individual-arbitration requirement over the Arbitration Act’s default rule of arbitration as a matter of contract. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 5:47 am
“That’s likely a matter of time,” said Hirsch. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 1:18 pm
It’s unclear what portion of the health-care workforce would be covered, were the FTC to adopt the rule as proposed, and were the rule sustained. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 10:32 am
It just deemed them immaterial, insisting that what matters (all that matters) is the literal text within a statute’s four corners—what it called “Title VII’s plain terms. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 4:59 am
Other aspects of the 2020 rules will survive, but, going forward, the process between proxy advisory firms and subject companies will be primarily a matter for private ordering, much as it was before the 2020 rules. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 5:31 am
"What the petitioners are asking the court to do, however, is to create and confer upon itself subject matter jurisdiction where subject matter jurisdiction does not exist. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 8:48 am
It’s very basic – broadcasters can’t censor a candidate ad, so they can’t reject it (or remove it from the air) no matter what its content is. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 6:55 am
Ontario should adopt “anti-SLAPP” legislation. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 6:12 am
Thus, even if the Commission has adopted a decision, the national supervisory authorities, when dealing with a claim, must be able to examine, with complete independence, whether the transfer of a person’s data to a third country complies with the requirements laid down by the directive. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 9:17 am
However, that plea had to be rejected as ineffective in the context of an application for the annulment of the Board's decision once that decision had been adopted, without the measure of inquiry in question having been implemented and without the Board of Appeal drawing any legal consequence from it which was unfavourable to Schräder. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 10:56 am
While this is fine and good, there is some indication that the SEC may again be considering the use of disclosure rules to indirectly regulate matters that are not federal securities law matters (see, e.g., conflict mineral rules, Iran-related disclosure rules, CEO pay ratio disclosure rules, etc.). [read post]
