Search for: "Park v State"
Results 4861 - 4880
of 11,293
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
We've already deplored the recent decision of the West Virginia Supreme Court rejecting the learned intermediary rule outright, State ex rel. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 11:40 am
Campos v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 2:11 pm
Details of the complaint and proposed consent decree in U.S., State of Missouri, and State of Nebraska v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 11:25 am
In ACLU of Illinois v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:53 am
In People v Hutt, the defendant refused to let medical personnel draw his blood and refused to provide a urine sample despite a warrant authorizing these samples. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:12 am
Police officers claim they were subjected to punishment after failing to meet their "traffic ticket quotas" Matarazzo v NYC Police Dept., 261 AD2d 142Section 215-a of the State Labor Law makes it unlawful to penalize an individual who fails to meet any quota related to the issuance of tickets or summonses written within a specified period of time for traffic violations. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 11:15 am
MICHAEL PALOMBI V. [read post]
26 May 2011, 3:20 am
” State v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:41 am
The compound contained a transportation building, a production building, and various parking lots. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 6:28 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 9:00 am
Turcios arose from a dispute over an apartment in Park City, Illinois. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 6:00 am
" This was stated as the law in the 1963, Texas Supreme Court case, Smith v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 11:47 am
Matt Bittle of the Delaware State News reports that in Rauf v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 9:01 am
In Guido v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 2:27 pm
V. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 7:58 am
Second Department: In Merget v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 9:51 pm
Roberto Castro de Figueiredo, Mobil v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
