Search for: "Park v State"
Results 4861 - 4880
of 11,298
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2015, 9:19 pm
Next Tuesday, December 8, the Court will take up the case of Evenwel v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm
The recent judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi is a must-read for anyone involved in contract law. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 1:03 pm
“What would be an example of an injury that occurs in a state park by a visitor to the state park that would be compensable? [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 8:55 am
Merlino v. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 9:57 am
It’s been nearly 10 years since plaintiff in Camicia v. [read post]
Once again, the RCMP calls for warrantless access to your online info. Once again, the RCMP is wrong
26 Nov 2015, 4:07 am
The Supreme Court of Canada, in R v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 4:29 pm
See United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 10:06 am
Reginald Lindsey v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:41 am
The compound contained a transportation building, a production building, and various parking lots. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 4:56 am
Frost, a moose hunter’s challenge to the prohibition on hovercraft in the national parks, and urges the Court to “restore the balance” that the Alaskan National Interest Lands Conservation Act “brokered between the state’s autonomy and federal interests in conservation. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 3:26 pm
Inconsistent Verdict of Massachusetts Jury in Car Accident Case Results in New Trial – Rose v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 12:03 pm
San Francisco Baykeeper, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 11:58 am
Masica — whether the National Park Service has the authority to ban fishing with a hovercraft on lands within a national park but owned by a state, an Indian entity, or private individuals [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in Heffernan v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 9:57 pm
His introduction of the untimely, unexplained, and unsworn-to photocopies of bills, checks and credit card statements are inadmissible to evidence entitlement to summary judgment (see CPLR 3212 [b]; Seidman v Industrial Recycling Props., Inc., 52 AD3d 678 [2008]; see also CPLR 4533[a]; Daguerre S.A.R.L. v Rabizadeh, 112 AD3d 876 [2013]; Matell Contracting Co., Inc. v Fleetwood Park Development, LLC, 111 AD3d 681 [2013]). [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 8:44 pm
Mental Hygiene Law §81.07(g)(1)(v). [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
* Digital files "property", says court in "female patronage" caseFrom Katfriend Ken Moon (IP/IT consultant to AJ Park, Auckland, New Zealand) comes this most helpful analysis of Jonathan Dixon v The Queen [2015] NZSC 147,a New Zealand Supreme Court ruling that goes further than traditional British rulings by analogising digital files to "property". [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am
South Korea A court has dismissed a defamation suit filed by President Park against South Korean politician accused of praising North Korea at ta [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:33 am
From Katfriend Ken Moon (IP/IT consultant to AJ Park, Auckland, New Zealand) comes this most helpful analysis of Jonathan Dixon v The Queen [2015] NZSC 147, a New Zealand Supreme Court ruling that goes further than traditional British rulings by analogising digital files to "property". [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 10:32 am
State v. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 8:18 am
Complaint was made about the state of the bathroom and the need to use a jug in the bathroom. [read post]
