Search for: "SUITS v. STATE"
Results 4861 - 4880
of 32,578
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2015, 9:14 am
Hargrove, et al v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 8:25 am
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 8:25 am
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 2:23 pm
The suit alleged that the school districts violated the federal Establishment Clause and the church-state separation provisions of the California constitution. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 12:39 am
The complaint (full text) in Landis v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 7:07 am
" Soverain Software LLC v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:44 pm
Kruglak, a partner in the New York Office, analyze Lorenzo v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 7:43 am
" Glory Licensing LLC v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 1:24 pm
Ambrosia Coal & Construction Co. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 12:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Association of Faith Based Organizations v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 12:19 am
ChesneyMedtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 5:06 pm
In a recent New Jersey Case, Bermeo v Bermeo, the court decided whether or not to increase alimony payments after a property settlement agreement. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 11:43 am
Va. 2009) - claiming that Karl established "public policy" and therefore mandated use of forum state law no matter how unrelated the suit. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Bus. v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 7:29 am
Specifically, the Court vacated and remanded the city of Boulder, Colorado’s suit to the Tenth Circuit, various California cities’ suits to the Ninth Circuit, and the state of Rhode Island’s suit to the First Circuit. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 3:43 pm
However, the constitutionality of these state-level measures have come under scrutiny in the pending case Micron Technology v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 5:36 am
(5) Plaintiff failed to state a cause of action for abuse of process. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 7:37 am
On Tuesday, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Stok & Associates PA v. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 9:37 pm
Caldwell v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 9:01 am
The district court denied the state’s motion, holding that the CRCA abrogated the state’s sovereign immunity from suit. [read post]