Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S."
Results 4861 - 4880
of 6,067
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2010, 3:58 am
Are sales being affected? [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:47 am
Jirak v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 3:52 pm
C. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 5:55 am
” U.S. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
Plewa is representing Joshua C. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:01 am
C. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 3:00 am
See Stobie Creek Investments LLC v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 9:17 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
It's certainly not cheap, but it's at least possible in some cases after Hamilton v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
[unless] (A) the competitive sales of either corporation are less than [$26,161,000.00 as of January 13, 2009]; (B) the competitive sales of either corporation are less than 2 per centum of that corporation’s total sales; or (C) the competitive sales of each corporation are less than 4 per centum of that corporation’s total sales. 15 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 7:06 pm
On May 7, 2010, Judge Frank C. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
: In re Cutting Edge Beverages, LLC (TTABlog) Fame of Coach's ‘Signature C’ design mark leads TTAB to Sustain 2(d) Opposition: Coach Services, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:15 am
Primary Health Care Limited v Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCA 419 [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here Colorado Couple Pleads Guilty to Illegal Trapping and Sale of Bobcats. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here Colorado Couple Pleads Guilty to Illegal Trapping and Sale of Bobcats. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:34 am
Because there's a zero-tolerance program run by the U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 12:52 am
Qualtex, one of the UK's less successful IP litigants in recent years (see here and here), must have had the smile wiped from their own faces when they lost again -- this time in Numatic International Ltd v Qualtex UK Ltd [2010] EWHC 1237 (C), a Chancery Division ruling from Mr Justice Floyd on 28 May.In this action Numatic sued Qualtex for passing off. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Robert C. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 3:56 am
Plaintiffs argued that an issue class certification under Rule 23(c)(4) was justified, but Magistrate Judge McCarthy -- citing the Second Circuit's seminal decision in McLaughlin v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 9:51 pm
There's a full-blooded critique of the Advocate General's Opinion in the soybean patent saga of Case C-428/08 Monsanto Technology LLC v Cefetra BV and others ("Purpose-bound protection for DNA sequences: in through the back door? [read post]
