Search for: "Short v. United States"
Results 4861 - 4880
of 10,138
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2015, 8:06 am
In DKN Holdings LLC v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 12:06 am
In DKN Holdings LLC v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
In an early case, Willingham v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 1:05 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently affirmed that copyright holders must consider whether a use of material is fair before sending a takedown notice. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 12:04 pm
Employment Division, Department of Human Resources v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 10:53 am
Guitar Center allegedly controlled nearly one-third of all guitar and amplifier sales in the United States. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:39 am
In the United States, copyright law principally serves as an economic policy by protecting creators’ ability to recoup the investments they make in generating new works that have value to society. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:48 am
In affirming the district court's decision, the United States Supreme Court relied on the ‘collective entity‘ doctrine. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
Historical footnote: I chaired the first ever CPD training session on intellectual property for solicitors, at the Queen Mary College IP Unit, on Day 1. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 10:29 am
United States , 425 U.S. 391 (1976) . [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 10:29 am
United States, 425 U.S. 391 (1976). [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 4:37 am
In People v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 4:28 pm
(Schrems v the Irish Data Protection Commissioner (Case C-362/14). [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:41 am
Episcopalians who are united in our desire to remain members in good standing in The Episcopal Church (TEC) and the Anglican Communion. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
(ii) Does such a person in any event remain subject to the legislation of the UK in the light of Point 19(c) of the United Kingdom’s annex VI to the Regulation? [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am
A facial challenge to Act 120 would succeed if a substantial number of its applications are unconstitutional, judged in relation to the statute’s plainly legitimate sweep (United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am
A facial challenge to Act 120 would succeed if a substantial number of its applications are unconstitutional, judged in relation to the statute’s plainly legitimate sweep (United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 12:31 am
It seems to me that is not the most desirable state of affairs. [read post]
